Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-22 Thread Jason Dillaman
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:29 AM Peter Lieven wrote: > > Am 15.02.21 um 13:13 schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > Am 15.02.2021 um 12:45 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > >> Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > >>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 15.02.21 um

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Peter Lieven
Am 15.02.21 um 13:13 schrieb Kevin Wolf: Am 15.02.2021 um 12:45 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +010

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.02.2021 um 12:34 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > Am 15.02.21 um 11:19 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:11:23AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > Am 26.01.2021 um 12:25 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > > > > even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years no

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:55:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 15.02.21 um 12:51 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > > > Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wr

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.02.2021 um 12:45 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > > > Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Peter Lieven
Am 15.02.21 um 12:51 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 a

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > > > Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wr

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Peter Lieven
Am 15.02.21 um 12:41 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. Bump

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > > > even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. > > > Bump the requirement to get rid of the if

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Peter Lieven
Am 15.02.21 um 11:19 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:11:23AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 26.01.2021 um 12:25 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. Sign

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Peter Lieven
Am 15.02.21 um 11:24 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. We have clear rules on when we bump minimum versions, de

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. > Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. We have clear rules on when we bump minimum versions, determined by the OS platforms we target: https

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:11:23AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 26.01.2021 um 12:25 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > > even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. > > Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven > > > dif

Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-02-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 26.01.2021 um 12:25 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. > Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build > index 5943aa8a51..02d263ad33 100644

[PATCH V2 1/7] block/rbd: bump librbd requirement to luminous release

2021-01-26 Thread Peter Lieven
even luminous (version 12.2) is unmaintained for over 3 years now. Bump the requirement to get rid of the ifdef'ry in the code. Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven --- block/rbd.c | 120 meson.build | 13 -- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 116