[PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Huth
Let's add two new tests: 1) Booting with "bootindex" is the architected default behavior on the s390x target, so we should have at least one test that is using the "bootindex" property. 2) The s390-ccw bios used to fail when other unbootable devices have been specified before the bootable device

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests

2020-08-06 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:53:49 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > Let's add two new tests: > > 1) Booting with "bootindex" is the architected default behavior on the > s390x target, so we should have at least one test that is using the > "bootindex" property. > > 2) The s390-ccw bios used to fail when ot

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests

2020-08-06 Thread Thomas Huth
On 06/08/2020 13.23, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:53:49 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: > >> Let's add two new tests: >> >> 1) Booting with "bootindex" is the architected default behavior on the >> s390x target, so we should have at least one test that is using the >> "bootindex" prop

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests

2020-08-06 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 13:58:47 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 06/08/2020 13.23, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:53:49 +0200 > > Thomas Huth wrote: > > > >> Let's add two new tests: > >> > >> 1) Booting with "bootindex" is the architected default behavior on the > >> s390x target,

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 v2 9/9] tests/qtest/cdrom: Add more s390x-related boot tests

2020-08-06 Thread Janosch Frank
On 8/6/20 12:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > Let's add two new tests: > > 1) Booting with "bootindex" is the architected default behavior on the > s390x target, so we should have at least one test that is using the > "bootindex" property. > > 2) The s390-ccw bios used to fail when other unbootable de