On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:43:22AM +, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> The 1st patch from the series seems to be useless. The patch extending
> queue length by adding machine type may break vm-s which use seabios
> with max queue size = 128.
>
> Looks like only this patch doesn't break anything and
The 1st patch from the series seems to be useless. The patch extending
queue length by adding machine type may break vm-s which use seabios
with max queue size = 128.
Looks like only this patch doesn't break anything and helps to express
queue size and seg max dependency (the specification
On 11/5/19 9:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 07:11:03PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>> seg_max has a restriction to be less or equal to virtqueue size
>> according to Virtio 1.0 specification
>>
>> Although seg_max can't be set directly, it's worth to express this
>>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 07:11:03PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> seg_max has a restriction to be less or equal to virtqueue size
> according to Virtio 1.0 specification
>
> Although seg_max can't be set directly, it's worth to express this
> dependancy directly in the code for sanity purpose.
>
seg_max has a restriction to be less or equal to virtqueue size
according to Virtio 1.0 specification
Although seg_max can't be set directly, it's worth to express this
dependancy directly in the code for sanity purpose.
Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov
---
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 2 +-
