On 12/9/19 12:17 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 09.12.2019 18:26, John Snow wrote:
>> (off list)
>>
Well, it isn't now, but oh well. :)
>> On 12/9/19 10:22 AM, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/6/19 5:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow
09.12.2019 18:26, John Snow wrote:
> (off list)
>
> On 12/9/19 10:22 AM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/19 5:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
bitmaps that are
On 12/9/19 10:26 AM, John Snow wrote:
> (off list)
lol, or not. No big deal. all the code goes upstream anyway (:
(off list)
On 12/9/19 10:22 AM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 12/6/19 5:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
>>> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
>>> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just
On 12/6/19 5:31 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
>> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
>> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
>> attached to emulated storage devices.
>>
>> Note
14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
> attached to emulated storage devices.
>
> Note that this will not migrate anonymous or internal-use bitmaps, as
On 5/20/19 6:37 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 20.05.2019 12:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 17.05.2019 um 12:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
>>> 16.05.2019 22:03, John Snow wrote:
On 5/16/19 6:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> But, on the other,
20.05.2019 12:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 17.05.2019 um 12:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
>> 16.05.2019 22:03, John Snow wrote:
>>> On 5/16/19 6:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
But, on the other, hand, if we have implicitly-filtered node on target, we
were
Am 17.05.2019 um 12:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> 16.05.2019 22:03, John Snow wrote:
> > On 5/16/19 6:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> >> But, on the other, hand, if we have implicitly-filtered node on target, we
> >> were doing wrong thing anyway,
> >> as
16.05.2019 22:03, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/19 6:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
>>> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
>>> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
>>>
On 5/16/19 6:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
>> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
>> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
>> attached to emulated storage devices.
>>
>> Note
14.05.2019 23:19, John Snow wrote:
> Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
> bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
> attached to emulated storage devices.
>
> Note that this will not migrate anonymous or internal-use bitmaps, as
Shift from looking at every root BDS to *every* BDS. This will migrate
bitmaps that are attached to blockdev created nodes instead of just ones
attached to emulated storage devices.
Note that this will not migrate anonymous or internal-use bitmaps, as
those are defined as having no name.
This
13 matches
Mail list logo
