Am 23.04.2021 um 11:43 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> 22.04.2021 19:43, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Normally, blk_new_open() just shares all permissions. This was fine
> > originally when permissions only protected against uses in the same
> > process because no other part of the code
22.04.2021 19:43, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Normally, blk_new_open() just shares all permissions. This was fine
originally when permissions only protected against uses in the same
process because no other part of the code would actually get to access
the block nodes opened with blk_new_open(). However,
On 4/22/21 11:43 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Normally, blk_new_open() just shares all permissions. This was fine
> originally when permissions only protected against uses in the same
> process because no other part of the code would actually get to access
> the block nodes opened with blk_new_open().
Normally, blk_new_open() just shares all permissions. This was fine
originally when permissions only protected against uses in the same
process because no other part of the code would actually get to access
the block nodes opened with blk_new_open(). However, since we use it for
file locking now,
