07.02.2020 21:01, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.11.19 19:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
block/block-copy.c
On 27.11.19 19:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
> bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> ---
> include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
> block/block-copy.c | 68
29.01.2020 20:12, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
On 27/11/2019 21:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
bloc
On 27/11/2019 21:08, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
> bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> ---
> include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
> block/block-copy.c | 68 ++
We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
block/block-copy.c | 68 --
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 35 del