On 28.04.20 11:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 28.04.2020 12:06, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
>>> patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
>>
>
28.04.2020 12:06, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
*stuff
below it.
Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare block_c
On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
> patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
*stuff
> below it.
Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare block_copy_task_entry()?
Max
> Signed-of
Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
below it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
block/block-copy.c | 66 +++---
1 file changed, 33 insertions