On 2023/07/03 13:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:17:16PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2023/07/02 21:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:02:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should
end
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:17:16PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2023/07/02 21:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:02:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should
> > > end the linked list formed with the
On 2023/07/02 21:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:02:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should
end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
Supersedes:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:02:25PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should
> end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
>
> Supersedes: <20230701070133.24877-1-akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
> ("[PATCH 0/4] pci: Compare
The ARI next function number field is undefined for VF. The PF should
end the linked list formed with the field by specifying 0.
Supersedes: <20230701070133.24877-1-akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
("[PATCH 0/4] pci: Compare function number and ARI next function number")
V2 -> V3:
Moved the logic to
