Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] bulk: Replace CONFIG_SOFTMMU by !CONFIG_USER_ONLY/CONFIG_SYSTEM_ONLY

On Tue Jun 13, 2023 at 11:33 PM AEST, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Missing review: 1, 7, 8 > > Since v2: > - Rebased > - Added R-b tags > - Rework i386_tr_init_disas_context() patch (Richard) > - Dropped RFC prefix > > This series aims to clarify the CONFIG_[USER|SYSTEM] vs CONFIG_SOFTMMU >

[PATCH v3 0/9] bulk: Replace CONFIG_SOFTMMU by !CONFIG_USER_ONLY/CONFIG_SYSTEM_ONLY

Missing review: 1, 7, 8 Since v2: - Rebased - Added R-b tags - Rework i386_tr_init_disas_context() patch (Richard) - Dropped RFC prefix This series aims to clarify the CONFIG_[USER|SYSTEM] vs CONFIG_SOFTMMU confusion [*] by using explicit definitions, removing mentions of CONFIG_SOFTMMU in