On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:45AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Grammar suggestions:
> Instead of connect_bh, bh_ctx and wait_connect fields we can live with
> only one link to waiting coroutine, protected by mutex.
Instead of managing connect_bh, bh_ctx, and wait_connect fields, w
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:45AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Instead of connect_bh, bh_ctx and wait_connect fields we can live with
> only one link to waiting coroutine, protected by mutex.
>
> So new logic is:
>
> nbd_co_establish_connection() sets wait_co under mutex, release
Instead of connect_bh, bh_ctx and wait_connect fields we can live with
only one link to waiting coroutine, protected by mutex.
So new logic is:
nbd_co_establish_connection() sets wait_co under mutex, release the
mutex and do yield(). Note, that wait_co may be scheduled by thread
immediately after
