On 2/10/21 10:58 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:28 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
>> the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
>> qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start with its default
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:28 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
> the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
> qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start with its default
> "max-connections":0 for unlimited), but is
On 2/9/21 10:08 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:27:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
>> the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
>> qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start wi
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:27:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
> the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
> qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start with its default
> "max-connections":0 for unlimited)
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:27:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
> the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
> qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start with its default
> "max-connections":0 for unlimited)
Our default of a backlog of 1 connection is rather puny; it gets in
the way when we are explicitly allowing multiple clients (such as
qemu-nbd -e N [--shared], or nbd-server-start with its default
"max-connections":0 for unlimited), but is even a problem when we
stick to qemu-nbd's default of only
