12.05.2021 12:59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:40:03PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Detecting monitor by current coroutine
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:40:03PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > Detecting monitor by current coroutine works bad when we are not in
> > >
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Detecting monitor by current coroutine works bad when we are not in
> > coroutine context. And that's exactly so in nbd reconnect code, where
> >
19.04.2021 12:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Detecting monitor by current coroutine works bad when we are not in
coroutine context. And that's exactly so in nbd reconnect code, where
qio_channel_socket_connect_sync()
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:08:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Detecting monitor by current coroutine works bad when we are not in
> coroutine context. And that's exactly so in nbd reconnect code, where
> qio_channel_socket_connect_sync() is called from thread.
>
> Add a
Detecting monitor by current coroutine works bad when we are not in
coroutine context. And that's exactly so in nbd reconnect code, where
qio_channel_socket_connect_sync() is called from thread.
Add a possibility to pass monitor by hand, to be used in the following
commit.
Signed-off-by:
