Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] fix & merge block_status_above and is_allocated_above

14.09.2020 16:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:04:21PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: v5: rebase on coroutine-wrappers series, 02 changed correspondingly Based on series "[PATCH v7 0/7] coroutines: generate wrapper code", or in other words: Based-on: <2020061010

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] fix & merge block_status_above and is_allocated_above

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:04:21PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > v5: rebase on coroutine-wrappers series, 02 changed correspondingly > > Based on series "[PATCH v7 0/7] coroutines: generate wrapper code", or > in other words: > Based-on: <20200610100336.23451-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] fix & merge block_status_above and is_allocated_above

ping :) 10.06.2020 15:04, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: v5: rebase on coroutine-wrappers series, 02 changed correspondingly Based on series "[PATCH v7 0/7] coroutines: generate wrapper code", or in other words: Based-on: <20200610100336.23451-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com> Hi all! These se

[PATCH v5 0/5] fix & merge block_status_above and is_allocated_above

v5: rebase on coroutine-wrappers series, 02 changed correspondingly Based on series "[PATCH v7 0/7] coroutines: generate wrapper code", or in other words: Based-on: <20200610100336.23451-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com> Hi all! These series are here to address the following problem: block-status-abov