Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] iotests: Skip Python-based tests if QEMU does not support virtio-blk

2020-01-31 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 1/31/20 8:08 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 30/01/2020 23.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" group, and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests without virtio-blk

Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] iotests: Skip Python-based tests if QEMU does not support virtio-blk

2020-01-30 Thread Thomas Huth
On 30/01/2020 23.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" >> group, >> and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests >> without virtio-blk likely does not make too much

Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] iotests: Skip Python-based tests if QEMU does not support virtio-blk

2020-01-30 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" group, and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests without virtio-blk likely does not make too much sense anyway, so instead of adding a check for the availability

[PATCH v5 5/6] iotests: Skip Python-based tests if QEMU does not support virtio-blk

2020-01-21 Thread Thomas Huth
We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" group, and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests without virtio-blk likely does not make too much sense anyway, so instead of adding a check for the availability of virtio-blk to each and every test