"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 07:15:09PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
>> (mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
>> splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 07:15:09PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
> (mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
> splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic implementations.
> After adding a new vq_size
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 07:15:09PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
> (mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
> splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic implementations.
> After adding a new vq_size
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 07:15:09PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
> (mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
> splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic implementations.
> After adding a new vq_size
On 06/11/2023 19:15, Alex Bennée wrote:
A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
(mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic implementations.
After adding a new vq_size property the rng, gpio
A lot of our vhost-user stubs are large chunks of boilerplate that do
(mostly) the same thing. This series continues the cleanups by
splitting the vhost-user-base and vhost-user-generic implementations.
After adding a new vq_size property the rng, gpio and i2c vhost-user
devices become simple
