Hi!
Kevin, what do think on this now? Do you think "[PATCH v4 0/3] qcow2: fix parallel rewrite and
discard (rw-lock)" still worth to update to cover reads and resend? (consider also my replies
to "[PATCH v4 0/3] qcow2: fix parallel rewrite and discard (rw-lock)" branch)
22.04.2021 19:30, Vladi
22.04.2021 19:30, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
It's an alternative lock-less solution to
[PATCH v4 0/3] qcow2: fix parallel rewrite and discard (rw-lock)
In v6 a lot of things are rewritten.
What is changed:
1. rename the feature to host_range_refcnt, move it to separate fil
Hi all!
It's an alternative lock-less solution to
[PATCH v4 0/3] qcow2: fix parallel rewrite and discard (rw-lock)
In v6 a lot of things are rewritten.
What is changed:
1. rename the feature to host_range_refcnt, move it to separate file
2. better naming for everything (I hope)
3. cover reads