On 3/4/20 4:45 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> I don't understand the rational for this change, but the result is
> correct anyway, so thanks for this nice cleanup!
Leftover from when 'no-else-return' was enabled.
It's mostly harmless.
On 3/4/20 10:38 PM, John Snow wrote:
This doesn't fix everything in here, but it does help clean up the
pylint report considerably.
This should be 100% style changes only; the intent is to make pylint
more useful by working on establishing a baseline for iotests that we
can gate against in the f
This doesn't fix everything in here, but it does help clean up the
pylint report considerably.
This should be 100% style changes only; the intent is to make pylint
more useful by working on establishing a baseline for iotests that we
can gate against in the future. This will be important if (when?
