On 9/3/22 14:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 13:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Not sure which job to choose yet. Per the first google hits we
still want to cover Catalina first:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 13:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Not sure which job to choose yet. Per the first google hits we
> > still want to cover Catalina first:
> >
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/3/22 13:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> > > Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
> > > default? IIRC the parallel
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 13.50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> > Would it be beneficial to have a 1 per OS job during PR, and
> > other jobs run nightly (once a day, not per PR)?
>
> Is there a way to trigger nightly runs in gitlab?
Yes, in
On 09/03/2022 13.50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Would it be beneficial to have a 1 per OS job during PR, and
other jobs run nightly (once a day, not per PR)?
Is there a way to trigger nightly runs in gitlab?
Thomas
On 9/3/22 13:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
default? IIRC the parallel execution of those were quite limited for the
free tier, so did you look close that we
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 11.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
> >
> > Could you ack this patch?
>
> Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
> default? IIRC the parallel execution of
On 09/03/2022 11.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
Could you ack this patch?
Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
default? IIRC the parallel execution of those were quite limited for the
free tier, so did you look close that we
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:17:53AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>
> Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
> 0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
> but with the following differences:
> - Enable modules
Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
Could you ack this patch?
On 7/3/22 00:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
but with the following differences:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
but with the following differences:
- Enable modules (configure --enable-modules)
- Do not run softfloat3 tests (make check-softfloat)
11 matches
Mail list logo