Now that the API offers also _locked() functions, take advantage
of it and give also the caller control to take the lock and call
_locked functions.
This makes sense especially when we have for loops, because it
makes no sense to have:
for(job = job_next(); ...)
where each job_next() takes the l
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:15:31AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
> index 71f793c4ab..5b79093155 100644
> --- a/blockdev.c
> +++ b/blockdev.c
> @@ -150,12 +150,15 @@ void blockdev_mark_auto_del(BlockBackend *blk)
> return;
> }
>
> -
Am 05/07/2022 um 10:14 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:15:31AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
>> index 71f793c4ab..5b79093155 100644
>> --- a/blockdev.c
>> +++ b/blockdev.c
>> @@ -150,12 +150,15 @@ void blockdev_mark_auto_de
Am 05/07/2022 um 10:17 schrieb Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito:
>
>
> Am 05/07/2022 um 10:14 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:15:31AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>>> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
>>> index 71f793c4ab..5b79093155 100644
>>> --- a/blockdev.c
On 7/5/22 16:01, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Am 05/07/2022 um 10:17 schrieb Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito:
Am 05/07/2022 um 10:14 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:15:31AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index 71f793c4ab..5
On 6/29/22 17:15, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
--- a/job.c
+++ b/job.c
@@ -1045,11 +1045,14 @@ static void job_completed_txn_abort_locked(Job *job)
/* Called with job_mutex held, but releases it temporarily */
static int job_prepare_locked(Job *job)
{
+int ret;
+
GLOBAL_STATE
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:22:41PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 7/5/22 16:01, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 05/07/2022 um 10:17 schrieb Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 05/07/2022 um 10:14 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 202
