[Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info

2016-06-03 Thread Fam Zheng
Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng --- tests/qemu-iotests/095 | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/095 b/tests/qemu-iotests/

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info

2016-06-03 Thread Max Reitz
On 03.06.2016 11:07, Fam Zheng wrote: > Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access > to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. The patch itself is good, but this commit message will not make much sense in the git log. I'd be fine with re

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info

2016-06-03 Thread Fam Zheng
On Fri, 06/03 16:52, Max Reitz wrote: > On 03.06.2016 11:07, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access > > to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. > > The patch itself is good, but this commit message will not mak

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info

2016-06-06 Thread Max Reitz
On 03.06.2016 11:07, Fam Zheng wrote: > Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access > to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/095 | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Thank

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info

2016-06-06 Thread Max Reitz
On 03.06.2016 11:07, Fam Zheng wrote: > Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access > to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/095 | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Thank