On 10 October 2018 at 11:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.10.2018 um 19:24 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
>> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
>> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
>> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host
Am 09.10.2018 um 19:24 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
> versions of clang warn about
On 10/09/2018 01:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
> versions of clang warn about this.
Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
versions of clang warn about this. Avoid the bug by not using the
"modify in place" byte
