Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] hmp: 'drive_add -n' for creating a node without BB

2016-02-25 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue 23 Feb 2016 06:16:38 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote: > However, libvirt can't use blockdev-add as long as it is still > experimental, and we're expecting that it will still take some time, > so we need to resort to drive_add. But how stable is the HMP API supposed to be? Berto

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] hmp: 'drive_add -n' for creating a node without BB

2016-02-24 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 24.02.2016 um 18:50 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > This patch adds an option to the drive_add HMP command to create only a > > BlockDriverState without a BlockBackend on top. > > > > The motivation for this is that libvirt needs to specify options to a

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] hmp: 'drive_add -n' for creating a node without BB

2016-02-24 Thread Max Reitz
On 23.02.2016 18:16, Kevin Wolf wrote: > This patch adds an option to the drive_add HMP command to create only a > BlockDriverState without a BlockBackend on top. > > The motivation for this is that libvirt needs to specify options to a > migration target (specifically, detect-zeroes).

[Qemu-block] [PATCH 1/2] hmp: 'drive_add -n' for creating a node without BB

2016-02-23 Thread Kevin Wolf
This patch adds an option to the drive_add HMP command to create only a BlockDriverState without a BlockBackend on top. The motivation for this is that libvirt needs to specify options to a migration target (specifically, detect-zeroes). drive-mirror doesn't allow specifying options, and the