On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2017 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> @@ -410,6 +442,18 @@ int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> >> }
> >> }
On 05/05/2017 12:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> @@ -410,6 +442,18 @@ int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
>>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> @@ -410,6 +442,18 @@ int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap
> *bitmap,
> }
> }
>
> +int bdrv_get_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
> + int64_t sector)
Is it a good idea
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 74 +---
block/mirror.c | 11 +--
include/block/block_int.h| 4 +--
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 23 +++---
4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)