Am 12.06.2016 um 00:06 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/07/2016 06:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 03.06.2016 um 19:03 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> >> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
> >> an
On 06/07/2016 06:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 03.06.2016 um 19:03 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
>> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
>> and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suf
Am 03.06.2016 um 19:03 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
> and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suffix)
> so that the compiler will help us catch
Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_transfer_length
and opt_transfer_length. Rename them (dropping the _length suffix)
so that the compiler will help us catch the change in semantics
across any rebased code. Improve t