C99 requires SIZE_MAX to be declared with the same type as the
integral promotion of size_t, but OSX mistakenly defines it as
an 'unsigned long long' expression even though size_t is only
'unsigned long'. Rather than futzing around with whether size_t
is 32- or 64-bits wide (which would be needed
On 10 October 2016 at 15:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> C99 requires SIZE_MAX to be declared with the same type as the
> integral promotion of size_t, but OSX mistakenly defines it as
> an 'unsigned long long' expression even though size_t is only
> 'unsigned long'. Rather than futzing around with wheth
On 10/10/2016 10:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> v2: rewrite into a configure check (not sure if directly adding a
>> -D to QEMU_CFLAGS is the best, so advice welcome)
>
> Writing into config-host.mak would be preferable I think.
>
Okay, attempted in v4.
>> I lack easy access to a Mac box, so t
On 10/10/2016 01:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 10:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>>> v2: rewrite into a configure check (not sure if directly adding a
>>> -D to QEMU_CFLAGS is the best, so advice welcome)
>>
>> Writing into config-host.mak would be preferable I think.
>>
>
> Okay, attem
