On 09/05/2018 05:54 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.09.2018 um 21:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 09/04/2018 02:15 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> post-script: I really, really hate the "fake cancel" we've implemented
>>> for mirror. It makes the job logic so much worse.
>>
>> Mirror really
Am 04.09.2018 um 21:30 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 09/04/2018 02:15 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
> >
> > post-script: I really, really hate the "fake cancel" we've implemented
> > for mirror. It makes the job logic so much worse.
>
> Mirror really does have a tri-state way to end the job (and
On 09/04/2018 03:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 02:15 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>>
>> post-script: I really, really hate the "fake cancel" we've implemented
>> for mirror. It makes the job logic so much worse.
>
> Mirror really does have a tri-state way to end the job (and accessible
>
On 09/04/2018 02:15 PM, John Snow wrote:
post-script: I really, really hate the "fake cancel" we've implemented
for mirror. It makes the job logic so much worse.
Mirror really does have a tri-state way to end the job (and accessible
only after the job has moved into the sync state):
On 09/03/2018 05:24 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2018-09-01 00:28, John Snow wrote:
>> In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in
>> installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting.
>>
>> Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John
On 2018-09-01 00:28, John Snow wrote:
> In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in
> installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting.
>
> Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow
> ---
> block/mirror.c | 27
In cases where we abort the block/mirror job, there's no point in
installing the new backing chain before we finish aborting.
Move this to the "success" portion of mirror_exit.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
block/mirror.c | 27 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13
