14.06.2019 18:52, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 14.06.19 15:42, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> Reopening a node's backing child needs a bit of special handling because
>>> the "backing" child has different defaults than all other children
>>> (among other
On 14.06.19 15:42, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Reopening a node's backing child needs a bit of special handling because
>> the "backing" child has different defaults than all other children
>> (among other things). Adding filter support here is a bit
13.06.2019 1:09, Max Reitz wrote:
> Reopening a node's backing child needs a bit of special handling because
> the "backing" child has different defaults than all other children
> (among other things). Adding filter support here is a bit more
> difficult than just using the child access
Reopening a node's backing child needs a bit of special handling because
the "backing" child has different defaults than all other children
(among other things). Adding filter support here is a bit more
difficult than just using the child access functions. In fact, we often
have to directly use
