Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: Print a warning for legacy drive options that belong to -device

On 10.05.2017 17:50, Thomas Huth wrote: > We likely do not want to carry these legacy -drive options along forever. > Let's emit a deprecation warning for the -drive options that have a > replacement with the -device option, so that the (hopefully few) remaining > users are aware of this and can

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: Print a warning for legacy drive options that belong to -device

On 11.05.2017 08:45, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Thomas Huth writes: > >> On 10.05.2017 17:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 10/05/2017 17:50, Thomas Huth wrote: We likely do not want to carry these legacy -drive options along forever. Let's emit a deprecation

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: Print a warning for legacy drive options that belong to -device

Thomas Huth writes: > On 10.05.2017 17:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 10/05/2017 17:50, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> We likely do not want to carry these legacy -drive options along forever. >>> Let's emit a deprecation warning for the -drive options that have a >>>

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: Print a warning for legacy drive options that belong to -device

On 10.05.2017 17:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 10/05/2017 17:50, Thomas Huth wrote: >> We likely do not want to carry these legacy -drive options along forever. >> Let's emit a deprecation warning for the -drive options that have a >> replacement with the -device option, so that the

Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] blockdev: Print a warning for legacy drive options that belong to -device

On 10/05/2017 17:50, Thomas Huth wrote: > We likely do not want to carry these legacy -drive options along forever. > Let's emit a deprecation warning for the -drive options that have a > replacement with the -device option, so that the (hopefully few) remaining > users are aware of this and can