On 2015/4/1 19:59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:49:39PM +0800, Bin Wu wrote:
>>
>> On 2015/4/1 16:19, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04/01 12:42, Bin Wu wrote:
From: Bin Wu
>>>
>>> What's the issue are you fixing? I think the coroutine already is running in
>>> the AioCon
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:49:39PM +0800, Bin Wu wrote:
>
> On 2015/4/1 16:19, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 04/01 12:42, Bin Wu wrote:
> >> From: Bin Wu
> >
> > What's the issue are you fixing? I think the coroutine already is running in
> > the AioContext of bs.
> >
> > Fam
> >
> In the curre
On 2015/4/1 16:19, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 04/01 12:42, Bin Wu wrote:
>> From: Bin Wu
>
> What's the issue are you fixing? I think the coroutine already is running in
> the AioContext of bs.
>
> Fam
>
In the current implementation of bdrv_drain, it should be placed in a critical
section as
On Wed, 04/01 12:42, Bin Wu wrote:
> From: Bin Wu
What's the issue are you fixing? I think the coroutine already is running in
the AioContext of bs.
Fam
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Wu
> ---
> block/mirror.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.