CC-ing qemu-block and Stefan Weil (maintainer of vdi).
On 06.05.2015 19:23, phoeagon wrote:
Thanks for your input.
So I changed it to:
1. Only call bdrv_flush when bdrv_pwrite was successful
2. Only if bdrv_flush was unsuccessful that the return value of
vdi_co_write is updated.
One of both is enough. Both are too much. :-)
It is indeed correct, technically (because ret is 0 before the
bdrv_write()), but it's too verbose. (See below)
In this way we try to avoid messing up any potential return value
checks possible while still propagating bdrv_flush errors.
That return value was a catch and I admit I'm no pro with the return
value convention in QEMU. bdrv_pwrite doesn't return the same value as
bdrv_pwrite_sync I assume (they do return negative values when fail,
but different values when successful)
It doesn't really matter, I think. Returning any non-negative value from
vdi_co_write() should be enough to signal success.
---
Signed-off-by: Zhe Qiu <address@hidden>
From 19b2fabbe00765b418362d8c1891f266091621f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoeagon <address-hidden>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 01:09:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates
In reference to
b0ad5a455d7e5352d4c86ba945112011dbeadfb8~078a458e077d6b0db262c4b05fee51d01de2d1d2,
metadata writes to qcow2/cow/qcow/vpc/vmdk are all synced prior to
succeeding writes.
---
block/vdi.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/vdi.c b/block/vdi.c
index 5d09b36..54a5fa8 100644
--- a/block/vdi.c
+++ b/block/vdi.c
@@ -713,7 +713,11 @@ static int vdi_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs,
logout("will write %u block map sectors starting from entry
%u\n",
n_sectors, bmap_first);
ret = bdrv_write(bs->file, offset, base, n_sectors);
+ if (!(ret < 0)) {
+ int flush_ret = bdrv_flush(bs->file);
+ if (flush_ret < 0)
+ ret = flush_ret;
+ }
I think bdrv_write() always returns 0 on success. In any case, it's fine
for vdi_co_write() to return 0 on success (which is what bdrv_flush()
returns), so shorting these four lines to "ret = bdrv_flush(bs->file);"
is enough.
The patch is correct, though, so if you want to leave it as it is, all
you need to do is bring it into proper form
(http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch).
The previous version was nearly right, except for the things I
mentioned: The subject needs to start with the part of qemu the patch is
targeting (in this case "block/vdi: " or simply "vdi: "), the
Signed-off-by needs to contain your name (or any alias you desire) and
your email address, and comments for the patch should be separated from
the actual commit message by "---".
Finally, for sending the next version, please change the "[PATCH]" in
the subject to "[PATCH v3]" in order to indicate that it will be version
3 of this patch.
Thanks!
Max
}
return ret;
--
2.4.0