On 07/06/2018 10:38 AM, John Snow wrote:
I think the "discard stashed state, making undo impossible"
interpretation is good because .commit() is not allowed to fail. That
function should only do things that never fail.
I think this is probably the correct way to proceed, and we ought to
06.07.2018 18:38, John Snow wrote:
On 07/06/2018 06:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Ok, let's go this way for now, I'll rewrite it.
Last requirement looks a bit strange for me in transaction context. We
should not assume that action is done before commit.
What is main idea of
On 07/06/2018 06:12 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
> Ok, let's go this way for now, I'll rewrite it.
>
> Last requirement looks a bit strange for me in transaction context. We
> should not assume that action is done before commit.
> What is main idea of transaction action, do
05.07.2018 23:40, John Snow wrote:
On 07/03/2018 06:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
qapi/transaction.json | 2 ++
blockdev.c| 53 ++-
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+),
On 07/03/2018 06:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> ---
> qapi/transaction.json | 2 ++
> blockdev.c| 53
> ++-
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
