On Fri 17 Feb 2017 01:30:09 PM CET, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> I think 'posix_madvise' was added for systems which didnot have
> 'madvise' [...] For the systems which don't have madvise call
> 'posix_madvise' is called which as per discussion is not right thing
> for 'DONTNEED' option. It will not give
>
> * Pankaj Gupta (pagu...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. I have below query.
> > >
> > > On Fri 17 Feb 2017 09:06:04 AM CET, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > > To maintain consistency at all the places use qemu_madvise wrapper
> > > > inplace of madvise call.
> > >
> > > >
