Re: [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] tweak test 83 verbosity

2017-10-30 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
27.10.2017 13:45, Eric Blake wrote: Commenting these two lines is enough to avoid the change to 083.out in 12/12. That is evidence that we may want these two lines to be trace points rather than error messages; or maybe we really do like the extra verbosity in the case of an unexpected

Re: [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] tweak test 83 verbosity

2017-10-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/30/2017 01:34 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > 27.10.2017 13:45, Eric Blake wrote: >> Commenting these two lines is enough to avoid the change to 083.out >> in 12/12.  That is evidence that we may want these two lines to be >> trace points rather than error messages; or maybe we

Re: [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] tweak test 83 verbosity

2017-10-30 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
27.10.2017 13:45, Eric Blake wrote: Commenting these two lines is enough to avoid the change to 083.out in 12/12. That is evidence that we may want these two lines to be trace points rather than error messages; or maybe we really do like the extra verbosity in the case of an unexpected

[Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH v6 13/12] tweak test 83 verbosity

2017-10-27 Thread Eric Blake
Commenting these two lines is enough to avoid the change to 083.out in 12/12. That is evidence that we may want these two lines to be trace points rather than error messages; or maybe we really do like the extra verbosity in the case of an unexpected communication break. This patch does not meet