On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:30:58PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > Does it still serve its purpose if we warn the user that the
> > graph structure can contain little surprises :)?
>
> As I replied to Berto, I think we can come up with some constraints
> about what qemu may do and what it wil
On 31.03.2016 11:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:07:17PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
>> As I responded to:
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>>
>> I think a genera
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:07:17PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> As I responded to:
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>
> I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would
On 30.03.2016 14:43, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 24 Mar 2016 08:07:17 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> There are two reasons why I fear we may not want this:
>>
>> The first is that the node graph is more or less something internal to
>> qemu. Its actual structure may (and most probably will) change
On Thu 24 Mar 2016 08:07:17 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> There are two reasons why I fear we may not want this:
>
> The first is that the node graph is more or less something internal to
> qemu. Its actual structure may (and most probably will) change over
> time. We do want to be able to let the use
On 29.03.2016 18:09, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.03.2016 um 17:56 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
As I responded to:
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
- http
Am 29.03.2016 um 17:56 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> As I responded to:
> >> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> >> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-deve
On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> As I responded to:
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>>
>> I think a general solution for
Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> As I responded to:
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>
> I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would be
> nice
As I responded to:
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would be
nice (I don't think we actually have one). The single patch in thi
10 matches
Mail list logo