Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface

2019-11-06 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 10:05 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Maxim Levitsky writes: > > > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:14 -0400, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption > > > > key managment to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface

2019-10-07 Thread Markus Armbruster
Maxim Levitsky writes: > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:14 -0400, John Snow wrote: >> >> On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: >> > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption >> > key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks. >> > >> > This is second version of this patch set. >> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface

2019-09-30 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:14 -0400, John Snow wrote: > > On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption > > key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks. > > > > This is second version of this patch set. > > The changes are mostly addressing

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface

2019-09-22 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:14 -0400, John Snow wrote: > > On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption > > key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks. > > > > This is second version of this patch set. > > The changes are mostly addressing

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface

2019-09-20 Thread John Snow
On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption > key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks. > > This is second version of this patch set. > The changes are mostly addressing the review feedback, > plus I tested (and fixed sadly) the