Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu on dsp anyone?

2005-05-11 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:03 -0400, Olivier Bourgois wrote: > Has anybody tinkered with porting qemu to something like a TI TMS320C6X > DSP host. The idea would be to be able to easily port LINUX and other > open source software to such a DSP. I would think porting uCLinux would be a better ide

Re: [Qemu-devel] Old DOS under Qemu

2005-05-11 Thread jeebs
Hetz; Thanks for checking into this. >partitions, format and boot the system) at http://bootdisk.com I know that place well... I've downloaded all of the boot disks from there and a few other places. >All of the above OS's recognized the hard disk (although DOS 3.3 >recognized 32MB of it, if

[Qemu-devel] qemu on dsp anyone?

2005-05-11 Thread Olivier Bourgois
Just a thought, Has anybody tinkered with porting qemu to something like a TI TMS320C6X DSP host. The idea would be to be able to easily port LINUX and other open source software to such a DSP. Embeded products could use the DSP's power natively to crunch at video codecs and such while an emu

Re: [Qemu-devel] Found a tun/tap patch for osx

2005-05-11 Thread Jason Brittain
Today I can finally confirm that the patch does work okay on OSX 10.3.9 (Panther?) with qemu source from CVS HEAD.. Or, at least, when I follow all of the directions on the page, I can boot qemu with RH9 Linux guest, and: - sshing from the host into the guest works. - pinging the guest's gateway f

Re: [Qemu-devel] Old DOS under Qemu

2005-05-11 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi Jeebs, I just read your mail and decided to try to do what you're doing, only I'm using Linux instead of Windows, and I'm using the CVS version. I have tried the following OS's: * IBM PC DOS 3.30 * MS DOS 5.0 * MS DOS 6.22 All of them are available freely (only the boot disks + some utilitie

[Qemu-devel] Old DOS under Qemu

2005-05-11 Thread jeebs
I've been trying to install various old versions of DOS under Window's v0.70 of qemu from FreeOSZoo. And since so few people appear to be using the Windows version, I've been making a point to do as much testing as I can, with as wide a variety of operating systems as I can find. >From version

Re: [Qemu-devel] Compile fixes for newer gcc

2005-05-11 Thread J. Mayer
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 22:10 +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 21:47, J. Mayer wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 02:49 +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > > The attached patch fixes some trivial build problems with newer gcc on > > > amd64. It adds FORCE_RET on load ops, > > > > Index: targe

[Qemu-devel] [patch] gcc4 host support

2005-05-11 Thread Paul Brook
The attached patch adds support for gcc4 x86 and x86_64 hosts. The main problem with gcc4 is that we can no longer force gcc to place the return from each function at the end of the function. My solution is to search the function for the "ret" instruction and replace them with a jmp to the next

[Qemu-devel] Re: info request

2005-05-11 Thread Elisa
you can get your free adult videos here: http://www.sexvicios.com/videos ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

[Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-system-sparc

2005-05-11 Thread Blue Swirl
Hi, You are probably using 2.4 or older target kernel? They don't work yet, for example prom tree reading often goes to infinite loop. Please try 2.6 series, 2.6.11+tcx kernel in the Qemu downloads section should work. _ Express you

qemu-devel@nongnu.org

2005-05-11 Thread info
_/_/_/_/_/$B5U1g!y?M:[EMAIL PROTECTED](BSM$B!yB(2q$$!yD>%aD>EE(B_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ http://awg.webchu.com/?springr _/_/_/_/_/_/ $B!xBg9%I>!V(B1$B1_!WL5NA%]%$%s%HB#Dh%-%c%s%Z!<%s7QB3http://awg.webchu.com/?springr $B!}7HBS!&(BPC$BBP1~$G%U%j!<%a!<%k$bMxMQ$G$-$^$9!#(B $B!}F?L>@

Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu with Kqemu on Fedora Core using GCC 4.0

2005-05-11 Thread Christian MICHON
Since we're checking which versions are working or not, just note gcc-3.3.6 and binutils-2.16 (both released 3rd May 2005) make a hell of a combination and qemu-0.7.0 works/rocks with it... Christian On 5/10/05, Michael McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't get it to compile with 2.96 ei