Dear Deutsche Bank Customer,
This email was sent by the Deutsche Bank server to verify your e-mail address. You must complete this process by
clicking on the link below and entering in the small window your Deutsche Bank online access details. This is done for
your protection - because some of o
Hi,
sparc-user build fails on x86_64 with gcc4 because op_fnegs() uses a local
constant (0.0) and dyngen can't emit it. Before I realized Paul fixed this
in his former gcc4 patch with a helper call (which is not in the final
gcc4 patch), I merged the following from the SheepShaver dyngen.
Note: I
Hi,
I got a "No return instruction found in op_lmsw_T0" when building qemu
with the gcc4 patch + gcc3.3. push imm8 was misdecoded. Also fixed the
imul case at the same time.
Tested with gcc 3.3.4 (hammer-branch), 3.4.3, 4.0.1 (4.0-branch).
2005-06-02 Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
Ben Pfaff wrote:
Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I want to know, if it's posible to debug an guest OS like bochs, i
mean disassemble current instruction, step by step running,
possibility of change registers values, etc. I try to use GDB, but i
think
On Thursday 02 June 2005 17:32, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 June 2005 16:20, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
> >>but in order to disassemble i have to do "display /i $cs * 16 + $eip",
> >>this is for real mode, what is the syntaxis for protected mode?
> >>is there any var
Paul Brook wrote:
On Thursday 02 June 2005 16:20, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
but in order to disassemble i have to do "display /i $cs * 16 + $eip",
this is for real mode, what is the syntaxis for protected mode?
is there any varible that contains a pointer to current virtual address
of the n
On Thursday 02 June 2005 16:20, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
> but in order to disassemble i have to do "display /i $cs * 16 + $eip",
> this is for real mode, what is the syntaxis for protected mode?
> is there any varible that contains a pointer to current virtual address
> of the next instruction.
U
Ben Pfaff wrote:
Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I want to know, if it's posible to debug an guest OS like bochs, i
mean disassemble current instruction, step by step running,
possibility of change registers values, etc. I try to use GDB, but i
think this is for debbuging qem
Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to know, if it's posible to debug an guest OS like bochs, i
> mean disassemble current instruction, step by step running,
> possibility of change registers values, etc. I try to use GDB, but i
> think this is for debbuging qemu itself.
You can
"Arm is still the only target that really takes advantage of any of
the new functionality."
Sorry I missed this line :(
I hope you will still consider x86 target before x86-64. You'd get a broader
audience for testing/debug.
If so, let us know. I haven't switched to svn yet...
Thanks anyway
Chri
On Thursday 02 June 2005 11:53, Christian MICHON wrote:
> Paul,
>
> on mingw32/x86-XP host, I see no difference on benchs with i386-softmmu.
> You mentionned around 30% improvements. Any special compiler flags to
> use, or compiler version?
I also said that the arm-user emulation was the only targ
I want to know, if it's posible to debug an guest OS like bochs, i mean
disassemble current instruction, step by step running, possibility of
change registers values, etc. I try to use GDB, but i think this is for
debbuging qemu itself.
any clues?
thanks
_
if you want to stop the machine until you connect with gdb, you must use
the -S option too, this is to stop VM at start
Tero Kaarlela wrote:
I am having problems with using GNU debugger with qemu. when I use
option -s qith qemu qemu gives:
waiting for gdb connection on port 1234
but it do
Paul,
on mingw32/x86-XP host, I see no difference on benchs with i386-softmmu.
You mentionned around 30% improvements. Any special compiler flags to
use, or compiler version?
I applied the patch on a fresh 0.7.0 version.
Christian
On 5/31/05, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've made ava
On Sat, 28 May 2005 21:55:40 +0200, l'indien wrote:
> In order to improve Qemu PowerPC emulation, I need a synthetic overview of
> SPR registers, MSR bits assignments and implemented instructions for every
> specific PowerPC implementation I want to emulate. As I was not able to
> find this kind o
15 matches
Mail list logo
