Stuart Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Stuart Anderson wrote:
So, the question is:
Can I simplify this code to assume that guest and
host addresses coexist and use the copy_*_user() or
just the access_ok() interfaces?
No. Ideally you should use the same conventions as the Lin
Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.07.2007 um 18:57 schrieb Avi Kivity:
I can't get the IA64 version
of FreeBSD6.2 to boot under my 32 bit Linux, qemu just changes its
status bar to QEMU [ stopped ]
no reason or message is printed, it just silently stops.
I presume you mean the x86-64 (aka AMD64
Am 09.07.2007 um 18:57 schrieb Avi Kivity:
I can't get the IA64 version
of FreeBSD6.2 to boot under my 32 bit Linux, qemu just changes its
status bar to QEMU [ stopped ]
no reason or message is printed, it just silently stops.
I presume you mean the x86-64 (aka AMD64 or IA32e) version. Y
On 7/9/07, Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to use a 32 bit host to run a 64 bit guest? I can't get the IA64
version
of FreeBSD6.2 to boot under my 32 bit Linux, qemu just changes its status bar
to QEMU [ stopped ]
no reason or message is printed, it just silently stops.
Nigel Horne wrote:
Is it possible to use a 32 bit host to run a 64 bit guest?
Sure.
I can't get the IA64 version
of FreeBSD6.2 to boot under my 32 bit Linux, qemu just changes its
status bar to QEMU [ stopped ]
no reason or message is printed, it just silently stops.
I presume you mean th
Is it possible to use a 32 bit host to run a 64 bit guest? I can't get the IA64
version
of FreeBSD6.2 to boot under my 32 bit Linux, qemu just changes its status bar
to QEMU [ stopped ]
no reason or message is printed, it just silently stops.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band
On 7/9/07, wangji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Christian Mignon wrote :
>3) use DetaolB. It's one of the many reasons why I created it. :)
But slax as dsl do have X ,when DetaolB will include X with uclibc
not just busybox
upgrade to version 0.4.
X is already in since last version. :)
On 7/9/07, Michael Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks...I am working with a couple of distros I want to modify so they will
boot faster on QEMU and also utilize persistence. Customizing the
/etc/init.d/* scripts will be my next step.
with minor modifications (1 file) you can get similar
>Christian Mignon wrote :
>3) use DetaolB. It's one of the many reasons why I created it. :)
But slax as dsl do have X ,when DetaolB will include X with uclibc
not just busybox
Thanks...I am working with a couple of distros I want to modify so they will
boot faster on QEMU and also utilize persistence. Customizing the
/etc/init.d/* scripts will be my next step.
On 7/9/07, Christian MICHON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/8/07, Michael Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/8/07, Michael Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have run various live Linux CD distributions (Knoppix, DSL, Ubuntu, etc.)
under QEMU and was wondering if there is really a need to run the various
hardware detection scripts in the live CDs? Obviously, a script for getting
an IP address is n
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Stuart Anderson wrote:
Attached is a diff ...
Here's the diff.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Stuart Anderson wrote:
So, the question is:
Can I simplify this code to assume that guest and
host addresses coexist and use the copy_*_user() or
just the access_ok() interfaces?
Attached is a diff that shows what this will look like for the struct
13 matches
Mail list logo
