On 20 January 2011 17:08, Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de wrote:
Yes, that's a problem with some parts of the old code.
For files which you want to modify, you could remove
the spaces with your script before applying your other
modifications and create a separate patch which only
removes the
Make it possible to check whether a coroutine is the default main
coroutine (the leader) or not.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
coroutine.h |2 ++
coroutine_ucontext.c |5 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Each pthread should have its own current coroutine. This ensures
coroutines are thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
coroutine_ucontext.c |5 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/coroutine_ucontext.c
This patch series prototypes making QCOW2 fully asynchronous to eliminate the
timing jitter and poor performance that has been observed. QCOW2 has
asynchronous I/O code paths for some of the read/write common cases but
metadata access is always synchronous.
One solution is to rewrite QCOW2 to be
Add functions to create coroutines and transfer control into a coroutine
and back out again.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
Makefile.objs|2 +-
qemu-coroutine.c | 40
qemu-coroutine.h | 76
Add coroutine versions of the bdrv_aio_readv() and bdrv_aio_writev()
functions. The coroutine version doesn't take a callback and simply
returns the error value. Behind the scenes they are implemented using
bdrv_aio_readv() and bdrv_aio_writev().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
The qemu_in_coroutine() function checks whether or not we are currently
in a user coroutine. This can be used to distinguish between executing
normal vcpu or iothread code from executing a coroutine.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
qemu-coroutine.c |5 +
Converting qcow2 to use coroutines is fairly simple since most of qcow2
is synchronous. The synchronous I/O functions likes bdrv_pread() now
transparently work when called from a coroutine, so all the synchronous
code just works.
The explicitly asynchronous code is adjusted to repeatedly call
Implement transparent support for the following synchronous I/O
functions to be called from coroutines:
bdrv_read()
bdrv_write()
bdrv_pread()
bdrv_pwrite()
bdrv_pwrite_sync()
bdrv_write_sync()
bdrv_flush()
These functions will use asynchronous I/O behind the scenes but
otherwise behave the same
Add a function to get the current coroutine. There is always a current
coroutine, either the leader (default main coroutine) or a specific
coroutine created with qemu_coroutine_create().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
qemu-coroutine.c |5 +
QCOW2 with coroutines is not safe because synchronous code paths are no
longer guaranteed to execute without interference from pending requests.
A blocking call like bdrv_pread() causes the coroutine to yield and
another request can be processed during that time, causing to race
conditions or
Asynchronous image format code is becoming very complex. Let's try
using coroutines to write sequential code without callbacks but use
coroutines to switch stacks under the hood.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
Makefile.objs|2 +-
continuation.c
Hello,
For those who still use kqemu (not all cpu's support kvm;), here is a
small patch that re-enable the init_MUTEX() macro, whose removal
was planed in 2009: see https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/10
Signed-off-by: christophe pernod xtof.per...@free.fr
---
diff -up kqemu/kqemu-linux.c.ORG
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
---
hw/s390-virtio.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390-virtio.c b/hw/s390-virtio.c
index f29b624..850422f 100644
--- a/hw/s390-virtio.c
+++ b/hw/s390-virtio.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static void
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
---
hw/pci.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
index 63f476a..38a60ae 100644
--- a/hw/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci.c
@@ -1877,6 +1877,7 @@ static int pci_add_option_rom(PCIDevice *pdev, bool
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
---
hw/ppc405_boards.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc405_boards.c b/hw/ppc405_boards.c
index b1d2b94..912757b 100644
--- a/hw/ppc405_boards.c
+++ b/hw/ppc405_boards.c
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static void
Copied from a fix to the original code by Anthony Liguori
aligu...@us.ibm.com.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
coroutine_ucontext.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/coroutine_ucontext.c b/coroutine_ucontext.c
index
QEMU already has a visible container_of() macro definition. Avoid the
compiler error.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
continuation.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/continuation.h b/continuation.h
index 585788e..112df65
Check if the backend option is missing before searching the backend
table. This fixes a NULL pointer dereference when QEMU is invoked with
the following invalid command-line:
$ qemu -chardev id=foo,path=/tmp/socket
Previously QEMU would segfault, now it produces this error message:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2011, at 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Worse might also be that unknown issue that force you to inject an IRQ
here. We don't know. That's probably worst.
Well,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2011, at 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Worse might also be that unknown issue that force you to
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:25:05PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 21 January 2011 10:07, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@st.com wrote:
I have developed some tests for ARM-Neon in the form of C sources files
calling ARM Neon intrinsics, and comparing the results of the resulting
program with
On 22.01.2011, at 14:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2011, at 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Worse might also be that unknown issue that force you to inject an IRQ
here. We
On 22.01.2011, at 15:14, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2011, at 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Worse might also
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:28:06PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.01.2011, at 14:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2011, at 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Worse
From: qemu-devel-bounces+wschi=dolby@nongnu.org
[mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+wschi=dolby@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Schildbach, Wolfgang
-Original Message-
From: qemu-devel-bounces+wschi=dolby@nongnu.org
[mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+wschi=dolby@nongnu.org] On Behalf
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:32:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.01.2011, at 15:14, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 13:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
helper_addkc() in op_helper.c looks buggy, GCC 4.6.0 complains:
CCmicroblaze-softmmu/op_helper.o
/src/qemu/target-microblaze/op_helper.c: In function 'helper_addkc':
/src/qemu/target-microblaze/op_helper.c:133:14: error: variable 'd'
set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
On 18/01/11 21:51, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 18/01/11 17:36, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net
wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I have reported mysterious issues on NetBSD 5.1
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 18/01/11 21:51, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 18/01/11 17:36, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net
Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 18/01/11 21:51, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 18/01/11 17:36, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at
2011/1/21 Raphaël Lefèvre taylor.lefe...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Stefano Bonifazi
stefboombas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/18/2011 06:17 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Stefano Bonifazi
stefboombas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I am working on
Thanks ble,
The addk. Helper is now there only there to compute carry. I
Feel free to remove the unused statement and unusrd vars. Otherwise ill do
when im back again. Cheers
On Jan 22, 2011 3:43 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
helper_addkc() in op_helper.c looks buggy, GCC 4.6.0
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Robert Reif r...@earthlink.net wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net
wrote:
On 18/01/11 21:51, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Mateusz Loskotmate...@loskot.net
wrote:
On
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:43:36PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
helper_addkc() in op_helper.c looks buggy, GCC 4.6.0 complains:
CCmicroblaze-softmmu/op_helper.o
/src/qemu/target-microblaze/op_helper.c: In function 'helper_addkc':
/src/qemu/target-microblaze/op_helper.c:133:14: error:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:32:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.01.2011, at 15:14, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:13:03PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:58:25PM +0100,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:02:28PM +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:02:26PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-01-18 01:19, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:03:08AM +0100, Edgar E.
37 matches
Mail list logo
