On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of the
fourth release candidate for the QEMU 1.5 release. This release is meant
for testing purposes and should not be used in a production
30.04.2013 06:59, liguang wrote:
Signed-off-by: liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Thanks, applied to the trivial patches queue.
/mjt
15.05.2013 10:04, Hu Tao wrote:
target_phys_addr_t has been already replaced by hwaddr, but this
one is introduced after.
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao hu...@cn.fujitsu.com
Thanks, added to the trivial patches queue.
/mjt
Hi all,
It looks to me like at least some updates to existing qemu bug reports
on launchpad are gatewayed to the qemu-devel list, but the initial bug
reports are not. This makes no sense to me - is it intentional?
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
Builds with an enabled trace backend and -Werror fail.
Reported-by: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Cc: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil s...@weilnetz.de
---
trace-events |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/trace-events
On 18 May 2013 12:40, Andreas Gustafsson g...@gson.org wrote:
It looks to me like at least some updates to existing qemu bug reports
on launchpad are gatewayed to the qemu-devel list, but the initial bug
reports are not. This makes no sense to me - is it intentional?
I see initial bug reports
Am 15.05.2013 16:44, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 15/05/2013 16:36, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
This patch would break the build for me, if I didn't configure
--disable-werror. Using --enable-trace-backend=stderr in case it makes
a difference. Troublemaker flagged inline.
Yes, it does---and
Macro MOD_SHIFT is also defined in imm.h:
/qemu/hw/arm/spitz.c:280:1: warning: MOD_SHIFT redefined
/usr/lib/gcc/amd64-mingw32msvc/4.4.4/../../../../amd64-mingw32msvc/include/imm.h:309:1:
warning: this is the location of the previous definition
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil s...@weilnetz.de
---
Hello. We accumulated several more patches in the trivial patch
queue, all of which are simple, easy to verify and safe. One
of the patches are authored by me, -- this one removes a few more
double-includes in sources, because we were getting separate
patches removing double includes in single
As mentioned in LP:1179104 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1179104 ),
there's a segfault bug in qemu process once guest tries to use some TRIM
command against an IDE device on PPC. This makes qemu-system-ppc basically
unusable with any modern distribution, since mke2fs now issues TRIM
Il 18/05/2013 15:30, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
As mentioned in LP:1179104 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1179104 ),
there's a segfault bug in qemu process once guest tries to use some TRIM
command against an IDE device on PPC. This makes qemu-system-ppc basically
unusable with any
18.05.2013 17:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/05/2013 15:30, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
As mentioned in LP:1179104 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1179104 ),
[]
That's more or less a JFYI for now, but I don't really know what other info
is needed, -- I already provided some structures
Il 17/05/2013 22:29, Rempel, Cynthia ha scritto: Hi Qemu-Devel,
I am part of the RTEMS development community.
The RTEMS development community is considering having a Google Summer
of Code student test LinCAN on a simulated RTEMS target board using
QEMU, and have some questions:
1. What
18.05.2013 17:48, Michael Tokarev wrote:
18.05.2013 17:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[] Did you test SCSI as well?
Trying that now.
And I don't really know how to add scsi device to qemu ppc.
qemu-system-ppc -drive file=foo,if=scsi
creates no scsi device in the guest, at least not one visible
Il 18/05/2013 16:39, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
18.05.2013 17:48, Michael Tokarev wrote:
18.05.2013 17:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[] Did you test SCSI as well?
Trying that now.
And I don't really know how to add scsi device to qemu ppc.
qemu-system-ppc -drive file=foo,if=scsi
creates
18.05.2013 19:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/05/2013 16:39, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
And I don't really know how to add scsi device to qemu ppc.
qemu-system-ppc -drive file=foo,if=scsi
For example:
qemu-system-ppc -drive file=foo,if=none,id=hd -device \
megasas -device
The RTEMS development community is considering having a Google Summer
of Code student test LinCAN on a simulated RTEMS target board using
QEMU, and have some questions:
1. What guidelines should the student follow when writing the device
simulation, so the device simulation will be
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:23 PM, KONRAD Frédéric
fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
On 09/05/2013 19:54, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:27 PM, KONRAD Frédéric
fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to find a way to do reverse execution happen with QEMU.
Actually, it
Am 18.05.2013 20:24, schrieb Rempel, Cynthia:
The RTEMS development community is considering having a Google Summer
of Code student test LinCAN on a simulated RTEMS target board using
QEMU, and have some questions:
1. What guidelines should the student follow when writing the device
Would following the guidance in:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-07/msg00842.html
increase the probability the [CAN] device simulation would be committed to
qemu?
Yes, I think so.
Here is also some help which shows the fundamental
requirements for new contributions:
I am trying to enable MSI interrupts in em driver on freebsd guest OS, using
Qemu e1000 emulation in 0.13.0, but it does not seem to work. After adding MSI
support in driver,
pci_msi_count() returns 0, which means probably e1000 does not support it
in 0.13.0?
How can I make e1000 device (or
Hello All,
On Saturday 18 May 2013 23:23:28 Rempel, Cynthia wrote:
Would following the guidance in:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-07/msg00842.html
increase the probability the [CAN] device simulation would be committed
to qemu?
Yes, I think so.
Here is also some
On 05/17/2013 12:23:51 PM, KONRAD Frédéric wrote:
On 09/05/2013 19:54, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:27 PM, KONRAD Frédéric
fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to find a way to do reverse execution happen with
QEMU.
...
For now we tried some other things which
23 matches
Mail list logo
