-Original Message-
From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:33 PM
To: Xu, Quan
Cc: Wei Liu; Chen, Tiejun; ian.campb...@citrix.com; m...@redhat.com; Ian
Jackson;
qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-de...@lists.xen.org; Gerd Hoffmann
Subject: Re:
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 09:43 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 31/01/2015 00:55, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit d8d95814609e replaced a number of memory_region_destroy()
calls with object_unparent() calls. The logic appears to be that
subregions need to be unparented, but the base region is
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:07:16AM +, Xu, Quan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
[mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Wei Liu
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 8:26 PM
To: Chen, Tiejun
Cc: Wei Liu; ian.campb...@citrix.com;
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 08:40 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Adding Knut to CC as he particularly looked into and fixed the bridging
issues or the vtd emulation. I will have to refresh my memories first.
Thanks for cc'ing me, Jan -
Yes I did some work specifically to serve my need of being able to use
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hmm, so perhaps my idea for a later improvement:
Eventually we might want to move the new inline functions into a
separate header to be included from softfloat.h instead of softfloat.c,
but let's make changes one step at a time.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1346917 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346917
Just wanted to add that upgrading my kernel to a newer version fixed the
problem for me, too.
Host: 2x E5-2620V2, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Guest: 24 virtual cores, Windows Server 2008 R2
Before fix:
sudo uname -a
Hi,
I'm trying to debug qemu when it executes a simple arm executable. Where is
in the qemu code when executing a single arm asm instruction?
Thanks
Attila
Hello,
Qemu 2.1.0 is currently crashing with the log
[2015-01-30T08:17:29.512340Z] handle_qmp_command:5100 qmp_cmd_name:
migrate_cancel
[2015-01-30T08:17:29.857114Z] handle_qmp_command:5110 qmp_cmd_name:
block-job-cancel, qmp_cmd_arguments: {device: drive-scsi0-0-0-0}
On 2015-01-05 12:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2015-01-05 12:22, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Commit 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6 (machine: remove
qemu_machine_opts global list) removed option descriptions from the
-machine QemuOptsList to avoid repeating MachineState's QOM properties.
This
From: Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com
The requirements described in this patch are implemented by Add GDB
qAttached support.
This reverts commit 00e94dbc7fd0110b0555d59592b004333adfb4b8.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau chout...@adacore.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
With this patch QEMU handles qAttached request from gdb. When QEMU
replies 1, GDB sends a detach command at the end of a debugging
session otherwise GDB sends kill.
The default value for qAttached is 1 on system emulation and 0 on user
emulation.
Based on
On 31/01/2015 00:55, Alex Williamson wrote:
Commit d8d95814609e replaced a number of memory_region_destroy()
calls with object_unparent() calls. The logic appears to be that
subregions need to be unparented, but the base region is destroyed
with the device object. Doing hotplug testing
On 31 January 2015 at 16:50, Attila Csosz csos...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the arm-to-x86 call in QEMU code? Which tool/library call generates
this code?
We generate the code in target-arm/translate.c (actually we generate
a TCG intermediate representation which is subsequently turned into
x86
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:16:17 +0200
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:34:48PM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Use build_append_namestring() instead of build_append_nameseg()
So user won't have
On 31 January 2015 at 12:25, Attila Csosz csos...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug qemu when it executes a simple arm executable. Where is
in the qemu code when executing a single arm asm instruction?
QEMU works in two phases:
(1) we translate ARM code into x86 instructions
(2) we run the
Where is the arm-to-tcg translation?
Attila
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 31 January 2015 at 16:50, Attila Csosz csos...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the arm-to-x86 call in QEMU code? Which tool/library call
generates
this code?
We
Where is the arm-to-x86 call in QEMU code? Which tool/library call
generates this code?
Attila
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 31 January 2015 at 12:25, Attila Csosz csos...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug qemu when it executes a simple
Am 30.01.2015 um 22:30 schrieb Max Reitz:
On 2015-01-30 at 16:05, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 30.01.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Max Reitz:
On 2015-01-30 at 09:33, Peter Lieven wrote:
this patch finally introduces multiread support to virtio-blk. While
multiwrite support was there for a long time, read
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
I agree with you that they are two distinct problems, with perhaps a
3rd problem of how to generalize this to other devices than PCI devices?
Right now the
handling of requester IDs across bridges seems very rudimentary in the
QEMU
Am 30.01.2015 um 22:15 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 30.01.2015 um 22:05 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
Am 30.01.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Max Reitz:
On 2015-01-30 at 09:33, Peter Lieven wrote:
this patch finally introduces multiread support to virtio-blk. While
multiwrite support was there for a long
On 31/01/2015 16:10, Alex Williamson wrote:
Explicit object_unparent() is only needed if you recreate the memory
region during the lifetime of the object. This is rarely needed, and it
is simple to spot if it's needed. If you do memory_region_init* outside
the realize function, most likely
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hmm, so perhaps my idea for a later improvement:
Eventually we might want to move the new inline functions into a
separate header to be included from softfloat.h instead of softfloat.c,
but let's make changes one step at a time.
will
On 31 January 2015 at 11:56, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@linux-mips.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hmm, so perhaps my idea for a later improvement:
Eventually we might want to move the new inline functions into a
separate header to be included from softfloat.h instead
23 matches
Mail list logo
