Re: [Qemu-devel] x86, nops settings result in kernel crash

2012-08-16 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:45:15 -0400 (EDT) Tomas Racek wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:35:12AM -0400, Tomas Racek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am writing a file system test which I execute in qemu with kernel > > > compiled from latest git sources and running

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Next gen kvm api

2012-02-08 Thread Alan Cox
> >register_pio_hook_ptr_r(PIO_IDE, SIZE_BYTE,&s->cmd[0]); > >for (i = 1; i< 7; i++) { > > register_pio_hook_ptr_r(PIO_IDE + i, SIZE_BYTE,&s->cmd[i]); > > register_pio_hook_ptr_w(PIO_IDE + i, SIZE_BYTE,&s->cmd[i]); > >} > > You can't easily serialize updates to that address

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Next gen kvm api

2012-02-08 Thread Alan Cox
> If the fd overhead really is a problem, perhaps the fd could be retained > for setup operations, and omitted only on calls that require a vcpu to > have been already set up on the current thread? Quite frankly I'd like to have an fd because it means you've got a meaningful way of ensuring that i

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU/MIPS & dyntick kernel

2007-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
> Well on real hardware, the instruction rate and the timer are linked: > the timer run at half the speed of the CPU. As the corresponding > assembly code is very small, only uses registers and is run in kernel > mode, you know for sure that 48 cycles is more than enough. What happens on NMI or if