Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-29 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 09:04:51AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:42:14AM +0800, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >> >> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-29 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:42:14AM +0800, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >> >> >> On 12/25/2015 8:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >As long as you keep up this vague talk about performance during >> >migration, without even bothering with any mea

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-27 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Dong, Eddie wrote: >> > >> > Even if the device driver doesn't support migration, you still want to >> > migrate VM? That maybe risk and we should add the "bad path" for the >> > driver at least. >> >> At a minimum we should have support for hot-plug if we are expe

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-27 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 02:31:14PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> The PCI hot-plug specification calls out that the OS can optionally >> implement a "pause" mechanism which is meant to be used for

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-25 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > Merry Christmas. > Sorry for later response due to personal affair. > > On 2015年12月14日 03:30, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> > These sounds we need to add a faked bridge for migration and adding a >>> > driver i

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86: Create dma_mark_dirty to dirty pages used for DMA by VM guest

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:59:13AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:34:00AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >&g

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86: Create dma_mark_dirty to dirty pages used for DMA by VM guest

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:34:00AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> > This way distro can use a guest agent to disable >> > dirtying until before migration starts. >> >> Right. For a v2 version I would

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86: Create dma_mark_dirty to dirty pages used for DMA by VM guest

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 01:28:31PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> This patch is meant to provide the guest with a way of flagging DMA pages >> as being dirty to the host when using a direct-assign device within a

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] swiotlb: Fold static unmap and sync calls into calling functions

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
ide the if statement instead of using a return in the case of sync and unmap. By doing this we make it so that we can also add a dma_mark_dirty function later. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- lib/swiotlb.c | 81 +++-- 1 file changed, 33 inserti

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/3] xen/swiotlb: Fold static unmap and sync calls into calling functions

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
ide the if statement instead of using a return in the case of sync and unmap. By doing this we make it so that we can also add a dma_mark_dirty function later. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 90 ++--- 1 file changed, 36 inserti

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
elect "SWIOTLB page dirtying" from the "Processor type and features" menu. --- Alexander Duyck (3): swiotlb: Fold static unmap and sync calls into calling functions xen/swiotlb: Fold static unmap and sync calls into calling functions x86: Create dma_mark_dirty to di

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86: Create dma_mark_dirty to dirty pages used for DMA by VM guest

2015-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
sible to modify current migration approaches so that instead of having to hot-remove the device before starting the migration this can instead be delayed until the period before the final stop and copy. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |3 ++- arch/

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

2015-12-13 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Yang Zhang wrote: > On 2015/12/14 12:54, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Yang Zhang >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2015/12/14 5:28, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>&g

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

2015-12-13 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Yang Zhang wrote: > On 2015/12/14 5:28, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> This patch set is meant to be the guest side code for a proof of concept >> involving leaving pass-through devices in the guest during the warm-up >> phase of guest l

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-13 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > > > On 12/11/2015 1:16 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/10/2015 7:41 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: &g

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-10 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:38:32PM +0800, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >> >> >> On 12/10/2015 7:41 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> >>Ideally, it is able to leave guest driver unmodified but it requires the >> >>>hypervisor or qemu to aware th

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-10 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > > > On 12/10/2015 7:41 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >>> >>> Ideally, it is able to leave guest driver unmodified but it requires the >>> >hypervisor or qemu to aware the device which means we may need a driver >>> > in >>> >hypervisor or q

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)

2015-12-09 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > For other kind of devices, it's hard to work. > We are also adding migration support for QAT(QuickAssist Technology) device. > > QAT device user case introduction. > Server, networking, big data, and storage applications use QuickAssist > Techn

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-09 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > > > On 12/8/2015 1:12 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >>> >>> On 12/5/2015 1:07 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:12:08AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >> > On 12/5/2015 1:07 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> > If can't do that, we have to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > On 12/5/2015 1:07 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> >>> >>> We still need to support Windows guest for migration and this is why our >>> patches keep all changes in the driver since it's impossible to c

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-04 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 12/04/2015 08:32 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: Hi Michael & Alexander: Thanks a lot for your comments and suggestions. We still need to support Windows guest for migration and this is why our patches keep all changes in the driver since it's impossible to change Windows kernel. That is a poor argu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 00/10] Qemu: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-03 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > On 12/1/2015 11:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> >>> But >>> it requires guest OS to do specific configurations inside and rely on >>> bonding driver which blocks it work on Windows. >>> From performance side, >>> putting VF and virtio NIC

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-01 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:04:32AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > There are several components to this: >> > - dma_map_* needs to prevent page

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-12-01 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:04:31PM +0800, Lan, Tianyu wrote: >> >> >> On 12/1/2015 12:07 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >They can only be corrected if the underlying assumptions are correct >> >and

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-11-30 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > On 11/26/2015 11:56 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> > I am not saying you cannot modify the drivers, however what you are >> doing is far too invasive. Do you seriously plan on modifying all of >> the PCI dev

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-11-25 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dong, Eddie wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: >> > On 2015年11月25日 13:30, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> No, what I am getting at is that you can't go around and modify the >> >> configurati

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 3/3] Ixgbevf: Add migration support for ixgbevf driver

2015-11-25 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 08:24:38AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> Also, assuming you just want to do ifdown/ifup for some reason, it's >> >> easy enough to do using a guest agent, in a completely g

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 3/3] Ixgbevf: Add migration support for ixgbevf driver

2015-11-25 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: > On 11/25/2015 8:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> Frankly, I don't really see what this short term hack buys us, >> and if it goes in, we'll have to maintain it forever. >> > > The framework of how to notify VF about migration status won't

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-11-25 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > On 2015年11月25日 13:30, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> No, what I am getting at is that you can't go around and modify the >> configuration space for every possible device out there. This >> solution won't scale.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 3/3] Ixgbevf: Add migration support for ixgbevf driver

2015-11-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:38:18PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: >> This patch is to add migration support for ixgbevf driver. Using >> faked PCI migration capability table communicates with Qemu to >> share migration status and mailbox irq v

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-11-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > On 2015年11月24日 22:20, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> I'm still not a fan of this approach. I really feel like this is >> something that should be resolved by extending the existing PCI hot-plug >> rather than trying to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 0/3] IXGBE/VFIO: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-11-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 11/24/2015 05:38 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patchset is to propose a solution of adding live migration support for SRIOV NIC. During migration, Qemu needs to let VF driver in the VM to know migration start and end. Qemu adds faked PCI migration capability to help to sync status between two si

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-30 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/29/2015 07:41 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2015年10月30日 00:17, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 10/29/2015 01:33 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2015年10月29日 14:58, Alexander Duyck wrote: Your code was having to do a bunch of shuffling in order to get things set up so that you could bring the interface

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-29 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/29/2015 01:33 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2015年10月29日 14:58, Alexander Duyck wrote: Your code was having to do a bunch of shuffling in order to get things set up so that you could bring the interface back up. I would argue that it may actually be faster at least on the bring-up to just drop

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-28 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/28/2015 11:12 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2015年10月26日 23:03, Alexander Duyck wrote: No. I think you are missing the fact that there are 256 descriptors per page. As such if you dirty just 1 you will be pulling in 255 more, of which you may or may not have pulled in the receive buffer for

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-26 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/25/2015 10:36 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2015年10月24日 02:36, Alexander Duyck wrote: I was thinking about it and I am pretty sure the dummy write approach is problematic at best. Specifically the issue is that while you are performing a dummy write you risk pulling in descriptors for data

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 05/12] IXGBE: Add new sysfs interface of "notify_vf"

2015-10-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/24/2015 08:43 AM, Lan, Tianyu wrote: On 10/22/2015 4:52 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: Also have you even considered the MSI-X configuration on the VF? I haven't seen anything anywhere that would have migrated the VF's MSI-X configuration from BAR 3 on one system to the new syste

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-23 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/23/2015 12:05 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:36 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patchset is to propose a new solution to add live migration support for 82599 SRIOV network card. Im our solution, we prefer to put all

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-23 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patchset is to propose a new solution to add live migration support for 82599 SRIOV network card. Im our solution, we prefer to put all device specific operation into VF and PF driver and make code in the Qemu more general. VF status migration ==

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 06/12] IXGBEVF: Add self emulation layer

2015-10-22 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/22/2015 05:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:58:19PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: In order to restore VF function after migration, add self emulation layer to record regs' values during accessing regs. Signed-o

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 09/12] IXGBEVF: Add live migration support for VF driver

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: To let VF driver in the guest to know migration status, Qemu will fake PCI configure reg 0xF0 and 0xF1 to show migrate status and get ack from VF driver. When migration starts, Qemu will set reg "0xF0" to 1, notify VF driver via triggering mail box msg a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 00/12] IXGBE: Add live migration support for SRIOV NIC

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 12:20 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 21:45 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patchset is to propose a new solution to add live migration support for 82599 SRIOV network card. In our solution, we prefer to put all

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 08/12] IXGBEVF: Rework code of finding the end transmit desc of package

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: When transmit a package, the end transmit desc of package indicates whether package is sent already. Current code records the end desc's pointer in the next_to_watch of struct tx buffer. This code will be broken if shifting desc ring after migration. The

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 10/12] IXGBEVF: Add lock to protect tx/rx ring operation

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: Ring shifting during restoring VF function maybe race with original ring operation(transmit/receive package). This patch is to add tx/rx lock to protect ring related data. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 06/12] IXGBEVF: Add self emulation layer

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: In order to restore VF function after migration, add self emulation layer to record regs' values during accessing regs. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/Makefile| 3 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgb

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 05/12] IXGBE: Add new sysfs interface of "notify_vf"

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patch is to add new sysfs interface of "notify_vf" under sysfs directory of VF PCI device for Qemu to notify VF when migration status is changed. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 30 ++

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 03/12] IXGBE: Add sysfs interface for Qemu to migrate VF status in the PF driver

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patch is to add sysfs interface state_in_pf under sysfs directory of VF PCI device for Qemu to get and put VF status in the PF driver during migration. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 156 +++

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 02/12] IXGBE: Add new mail box event to restore VF status in the PF driver

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: This patch is to restore VF status in the PF driver when get event from VF. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_mbx.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 01/12] PCI: Add virtfn_index for struct pci_device

2015-10-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/21/2015 09:37 AM, Lan Tianyu wrote: Add "virtfn_index" member in the struct pci_device to record VF sequence of PF. This will be used in the VF sysfs node handle. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 1 + include/linux/pci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff

Re: [Qemu-devel] ioh3420: Add a map_irq function

2013-10-02 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/02/2013 10:12 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 15:10 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On 02/28/2013 10:49 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: >>> Every bridge needs to know how to map IRQs from it's secondary bus to >>> the primary bus. We seem to be

Re: [Qemu-devel] ioh3420: Add a map_irq function

2013-09-27 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 02/28/2013 10:49 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > Every bridge needs to know how to map IRQs from it's secondary bus to > the primary bus. We seem to be direct mapped on ioh3420. This avoids > segfaults when trying to put assigned devices behind root ports. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Ignore RX tail kicks when RX disabled.

2012-10-18 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/18/2012 07:31 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: >> The real purpose of check_rxov it a bit confusing indeed, mainly >> because of unclear name (rename?), >> however it works as following: >> >> There are 2 possible when RDT == RDH for RX ri

<    1   2