Hi Anthony,
On Thursday 29 March 2007 04:07, you wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
Hi Anthony,
On Monday 26 March 2007 01:44, you wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The tricky thing I still can't figure out is how to get ASM_SOFTMMU
working
Hi Avi,
On Sunday 25 March 2007 15:40, Avi Kivity wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
A full featured converter (cvtasm) has a lot of dependencies: it has to
support all hosts (M) (with all assembler dialects M') and all targets N,
i.e. in the worst case one would end with M'x N variants of it, or M
Hi Paul,
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 00:53, Paul Brook wrote:
I moved to helper2.c because AFAICT helper.c is compiled with the same
sort of restrictions as op.c which leads to the compile failure.
Yes, helper.c is compiled with the global register variables and the code
is called
On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
Hi,
Hi Axel,
By adding some GCC4 fixes on top of your patch, I was able to get qemu
for i386 (on i386) to compile and run. So far, I've only tested a win2k
guest.
Hi Anthony,
thank you for the test, I like
Hi Anthony,
On Monday 26 March 2007 01:46, you wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
Hi,
Furthermore I think one should move helper_pshufw() from
target-i386/helper2.c into target-i386/helper.c where all the other
Hi Anthony,
On Monday 26 March 2007 01:44, you wrote:
Axel Zeuner wrote:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The tricky thing I still can't figure out is how to get ASM_SOFTMMU
working. The problem is GLUE(st, SUFFIX) function. First GCC cannot
deal
Hi,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 10:51, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, axel wrote:
Why there exist two different blocks for COFF and ELF for x86/x86_64
hosts?
Because COFF is used by Windows, and ELF by Linux, and they are
substantially different?
Sorry, I did not
