Anthony Liguori writes:
> I don't think this is such a good idea. SIGTERM shouldn't be subject
> to the guest's interpretations.
OK. Just an idea. Thanks for the feedback.
> Instead of doing a killall qemu, just send a system_powerdown command
> to each qemu's monitor instance.
Yes, I know
by sending SIGTERM to all
processes still running and then SIGKILL if that didn't work. Let the
guest power down instead of just killing i instantly.
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
---
I wonder if I miss something obvious here... So this patch should be
considered a RFC. It certainly fixes a small pro
message level: 0x0007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: no
(qemu) set_link e1000.0 on
[ 84.304582] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control:
RX
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
---
hw/e1000.c|7 +--
hw/e1000_hw.h | 17
Avi Kivity writes:
> On 08/03/2011 03:42 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Anyway, I would appreciate if some solution was found which allowed
>> JUNOS to boot with an unmodified SeaBIOS with SMBIOS enabled, as long as
>> the number of CPUs is limited.
>>
>>
>
> Is
"Kevin O'Connor" writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> "Kevin O'Connor" writes:
>> > Also, it's possible the code could try to use the f-segment if there
>> > are less than say 16 cpus and use h
"Kevin O'Connor" writes:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:49:11PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> I just confirmed the issue running
>>
>> "JUNOS 11.1R3.5 built 2011-06-25 00:17:21 UTC"
>>
>> which is as new as it officially gets at the momen
Brandon Bennett writes:
>> Are all versions based on FreeBSD 4.11?
>> Are newer versions still affected?
>
> Newer versions should be based on 6.1 but there are a lot of changes.
> I haven't had a chance to test with something newer yet.
Sorry for the delay due to vacation...
I just confirmed t
"Kevin O'Connor" writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> It's been a while with little work and little progress on my side... But
>> I looked at this again today, and found that it may be related to the
>> SMBIOS table
Bjørn Mork writes:
> "Kevin O'Connor" writes:
>
>> It looks like memory layout changes in the f-segment is tickling the
>> underlying bug. I don't think SMBIOS, the above commit, or the other
>> commit identified earlier are the root cause of the p
Any reason why this isn't in stable-0.12? I got bitten by it on Debian,
using their qemu-kvm package from "squeeze".
Bjørn
commit d9812b033a17c82f9e933757c1c3ef364e3ba62d
Author: malc
Date: Sun Feb 28 18:34:21 2010 +0300
audio/alsa: Handle SND_PCM_STATE_SETUP in alsa_poll_handler
"Kevin O'Connor" writes:
> It looks like memory layout changes in the f-segment is tickling the
> underlying bug. I don't think SMBIOS, the above commit, or the other
> commit identified earlier are the root cause of the problem. Instead,
> I'd guess these commits just change the memory layout
Gleb Natapov writes:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 02:39:04PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:18:38PM -0700, Brandon Bennett wrote:
>>
>> > I have narrowed it down to SMBIOS. If I disable CONFIG_SMBIOS the
>> > image boots up fine.
>>
>> Gleb, have you seen this thread?
>>
error messages has never harmed a single gerbil.
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
---
sdl.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sdl.c b/sdl.c
index f26035c..34061c0 100644
--- a/sdl.c
+++ b/sdl.c
@@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ static void do_sdl_resize(int new_width
Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> eepro100.c is my work, so maybe I can help you.
>
> First of all: there exists a newer version of eepro100.c which
> fixes some bugs of the CVS version and largely improves
> support for big endian hosts and targets. Get it from
> http://svn.berlios.de/wsv
14 matches
Mail list logo
