Am 07.12.21 um 22:04 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
The zpci-interp feature is used to specify whether zPCI interpretation is
to be used for this guest.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
---
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 1 +
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 2 ++
target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
Am 02.12.21 um 21:54 schrieb Collin Walling:
On 11/23/21 01:14, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am 22.11.21 um 23:33 schrieb Collin Walling:
DIAGNOSE 0318 is invoked only once during IPL. As such, the
diag318 info will only change once initially and during resets.
Let's only sync the register
This
parm area has always been initialized to zero, so with older kernels this field
would read zero and we must then assume that only 896 bytes are available.
Acked-by: Viktor Mihajlovski
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/
My borntrae...@de.ibm.com email is just a forwarder to the
linux.ibm.com address. Let us remove the extra hop to avoid
a potential source of errors.
While at it, add the relevant email addresses to mailmap.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
.mailmap| 1 +
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++---
2
Am 23.11.21 um 10:55 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
My borntrae...@de.ibm.com email is just a forwarder to the
linux.ibm.com address. Let us remove the extra hop to avoid
a potential source of errors.
While at it, add the relevant email addresses to mailmap.
Signed-off-by: Christian
My borntrae...@de.ibm.com email is just a forwarder to the
linux.ibm.com address. Let us remove the extra hop to avoid
a potential source of errors.
While at it, add the relevant email addresses to mailmap.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
.mailmap| 1 +
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++---
2
;s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318")
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
Thomas, I think this is good to go. Will you take it via your tree?
---
Changelog:
v4
- fixed up commit message and added r-b's
v3
Am 22.11.21 um 23:33 schrieb Collin Walling:
DIAGNOSE 0318 is invoked only once during IPL. As such, the
diag318 info will only change once initially and during resets.
Let's only sync the register to convey the info to KVM if and
only if the diag318 info has changed. Only set the dirty bit
, the CPNC will be retained
for each VCPU in the configuration after the diag 318 instruction
has been invoked.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling
Fixes: fabdada9357b ("s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318")
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
maybe add cc s
Walling
Fixes: fabdada9357b ("s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318")
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger
It would be good to add at least a comment in the diag308 handlers
where the value of cpnc is resetted during the resets that Janosch
mentioned.
---
Changelog:
v2
Am 08.11.21 um 18:02 schrieb Janosch Frank:
On 11/5/21 23:46, Collin Walling wrote:
The CPNC portion of the diag 318 data is erroneously reset during an
initial CPU reset caused by SIGP. Let's go ahead and relocate the
diag318_info field within the CPUS390XState struct such that it is
only
Am 05.11.21 um 23:46 schrieb Collin Walling:
The CPNC portion of the diag 318 data is erroneously reset during an
initial CPU reset caused by SIGP. Let's go ahead and relocate the
diag318_info field within the CPUS390XState struct such that it is
only zeroed during a clear reset. This way,
a relative path.
The obvious function to resolve relative paths is
object_resolve_path(). It picks a parent automatically. Too much
magic, we want to specify the parent. Create new
object_resolve_path_at() for that, and use it in find_device_state().
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger
Si
Am 15.10.21 um 21:15 schrieb Richard Henderson:
On 10/15/21 4:08 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am 13.10.21 um 11:07 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
From: Markus Armbruster
Commit 6287d827d4 "monitor: allow device_del to accept QOM paths"
extended find_device_state() to accept
Am 13.10.21 um 11:07 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
From: Markus Armbruster
Commit 6287d827d4 "monitor: allow device_del to accept QOM paths"
extended find_device_state() to accept QOM paths in addition to qdev
IDs. This added a checked conversion to TYPE_DEVICE at the end, which
duplicates the
Am 13.10.21 um 12:10 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 07:39:21AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices
MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not
been acknowledged by the driver."
Am 11.10.21 um 09:09 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
On 08.10.21 22:38, Eric Farman wrote:
When building a Stop IRQ to pass to KVM, we should incorporate
the flags if handling the SIGP Stop and Store Status order.
With that, KVM can reject other orders that are submitted for
the same CPU while
Am 06.10.21 um 11:26 schrieb Marc Hartmayer:
Check if the provided kernel command line exceeds the maximum size of the s390x
Linux kernel command line size, which is 896 bytes.
Reported-by: Sven Schnelle
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x
Peter, Michael,
do we still do stable releases for QEMU or has this stopped?
Am 24.09.21 um 07:27 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Yes, the question is whether it still exists... Paolo El jue., 23 sept. 2021 16:48,
Christian Borntraeger escribió: Am 23.09.21 um 15:04
schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Li
Am 23.09.21 um 15:04 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Linux limits the size of iovecs to 1024 (UIO_MAXIOV in the kernel
sources, IOV_MAX in POSIX). Because of this, on some host adapters
requests with many iovecs are rejected with -EINVAL by the
io_submit() or readv()/writev() system calls.
In fact,
Am 22.09.21 um 21:51 schrieb Halil Pasic:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:24:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:18:12 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
bs->sg is only true for character devices, but block devices can also
be used with scsi-block and scsi-generic. Unfortunately BLKSECTGET
Add the new gen16 features to the default model and fence them for
machine version 6.1 and earlier.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 5 +
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x
On 07.09.21 11:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Add the new gen16 features to the default model and fence them for
machine version 6.1 and earlier.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 5 +
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 8 +++-
2 files changed
Add the new gen16 features to the default model and fence them for
machine version 6.1 and earlier.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 5 +
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 8 +++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x
On 26.08.21 11:22, Pierre Morel wrote:
a gentle ping :)
I would like if you have time, comments on the architecture I propose,
if the handling is done at the right level, KVM vs QEMU.
Do we expect changes in this series due to the discussed changes of PTF
interpretion?
Therefor I
On 27.08.21 12:50, Pierre Morel wrote:
Hello All,
This series presents a VIRTIO test device which receives data on its
input channel and sends back a simple checksum for the data it received
on its output channel.
The goal is to allow a simple VIRTIO device driver to check the VIRTIO
On 19.08.21 16:51, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 19.08.21 10:43, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Interestingly enough this breaks my rpmbuild (both rpmbuild and mock).
(mostly with a modified f35 spec file):
cc -Isubprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.a.p -Isubprojects/libvhost-user -I
On 19.08.21 10:43, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Interestingly enough this breaks my rpmbuild (both rpmbuild and mock).
(mostly with a modified f35 spec file):
cc -Isubprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.a.p -Isubprojects/libvhost-user
-I../subprojects/libvhost-user -fdiagnostics-color=auto
Interestingly enough this breaks my rpmbuild (both rpmbuild and mock).
(mostly with a modified f35 spec file):
cc -Isubprojects/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.a.p -Isubprojects/libvhost-user
-I../subprojects/libvhost-user -fdiagnostics-color=auto -pipe -Wall
-Winvalid-pch -std=gnu11 -O2 -g
On 16.07.21 16:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 16.07.21 16:51, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/16/21 4:28 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
--extra-ldflags="-Wl,--build-id -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now"
Full configure line is
../configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=
On 16.07.21 16:51, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 7/16/21 4:28 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
--extra-ldflags="-Wl,--build-id -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now"
Full configure line is
../configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --sysconfdir=/etc
--interp-prefix
On 16.07.21 08:54, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 12.07.21 14:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
Aside from a minor bloat to file size the ability to have TCG plugins
has no real impact on performance unless a plugin is actively loaded.
Even then the libempty.so plugin shows only a minor degradation
On 12.07.21 14:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
Aside from a minor bloat to file size the ability to have TCG plugins
has no real impact on performance unless a plugin is actively loaded.
Even then the libempty.so plugin shows only a minor degradation in
performance caused by the extra book keeping the
as discussed we want to change some facility names. Please merge
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 4 ++--
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x
On 30.06.21 17:32, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30 2021, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 30.06.21 15:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.06.21 22:19, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
This defines 5 new facilities and the new 3931 and 3932 machines.
As before the name is not yet known
On 30.06.21 15:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.06.21 22:19, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
This defines 5 new facilities and the new 3931 and 3932 machines.
As before the name is not yet known and we do use gen16a and gen16b.
The new features are part of the full model.
The default model
add the dependencies of new facilities and as a fix for z15 add
a dependency from S390_FEAT_VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL_ENH to
S390_VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 5 +
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 6 ++
target
5 new features and 2 new models
Christian Borntraeger (1):
s390x/cpumodel: add 3931 and 3932
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 5 +
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 6 ++
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 14 ++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
--
2.31.1
On 15.06.21 05:07, Richard Henderson wrote:
The PSW_MASK_CC component of psw.mask was not handled properly
in the creation or restoration of signal frames.
Maybe add a Reported-by: jonathan.albre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
in the right patches?
Richard Henderson (5):
target/s390x:
On 12.06.21 01:41, Richard Henderson wrote:
Instead of delaying tcg_region_init until after tcg_prologue_init
is complete, do tcg_region_init first and let tcg_prologue_init
shrink the first region by the size of the generated prologue.
Reviewed-by: Luis Pires
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée
On 10.06.21 11:49, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it
should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal
instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal
instruction
Folks,
I have CI on s390 on qemu/master for each commit. And from time to time I do
get spurious failures of 030. (always 030 and nothing else).
I have a hard time reproducing this manually so I cannot debug this at the
moment. Has anyone seen this as well?
030
gs as well.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
target/s390x/kvm-stub.c | 5 -
target/s390x/kvm.c | 10 +-
target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm-stub.c b/target
On 03.05.21 11:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/05/2021 11.14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2021 10:23:20 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
David Hildenbrand writes:
On 03.05.21 07:17, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/05/2021 06.58, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
Clang
On 23.04.21 09:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 23/04/2021 08.52, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
[...]
We can of course discuss if we compile the BIOS for z10 instead of z900. TCG
in the mean time can handle up to z13 and z10 is now also 13 years old.
I'd really like to see us supporting Clang
, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/22/21 2:41 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 22.04.21 13:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/04/2021 13.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/22/21 12:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:18, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
This silents the warning
homas Huth
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
untested, but
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile
index 29fd9019b83..21581d1258d 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-cc
On 22.04.21 13:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/04/2021 13.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/22/21 12:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:47:30AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/04/2021 06.18, Philippe
On 22.04.21 06:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/04/2021 06.18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Thomas, Daniel, Stefano,
Regarding the following warning (GCC 11 on Fedora 34):
In file included from pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c:11:
In function ‘memset’,
inlined from ‘boot_setup’ at
h
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c
index 44df7d16af..e4b2e5a1b0 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootma
On 25.03.21 14:55, Matthew Rosato wrote:
S390 PCI currently has no backup, add one. Add an additional backup
for vfio-ccw and refresh the backup for vfio-ap.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
MAINTAINERS | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2
("block: Clarify error messages pertaining to
'node-name'")
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger
Thanks for the quick response.
---
tests/qemu-iotests/051.out | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/051.o
On s390 with latest master I do get
051 fail [17:30:00] [17:30:05] 5.4s output mismatch
(see 051.out.bad)
--- /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/051.out
+++ 051.out.bad
@@ -61,13 +61,13 @@
(qemu) quit
Testing: -drive file=TEST_DIR/t.qcow2,node-name=123foo
Christian Borntraeger
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
Since v2:
- Remove pic_intack() call (Zoltan)
---
hw/intc/i8259.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
index 3
On 18.03.21 17:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 18/03/21 16:47, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
some copiler versions are smart enough to detect a potentially
uninitialized variable, but are not smart enough to detect that this
cannot happen due to the code flow:
../hw/intc/i8259.c: In function
in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
203 | irq = irq2 + 8;
| ^~
Let us initialize irq2 to -1 to avoid this warning as the most simple
solution.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/intc/i8259.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
-cmds.c',
'numa.c',
Also
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger
On 15.03.21 17:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/15/21 5:16 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 08.03.21 14:50, Alex Bennée wrote:
Hypervisors, especially type-1 ones, need the firmware/bootcode to put
their initial guest somewhere in memory and pass the information to it
via
On 15.03.21 17:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15/03/2021 16.44, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 15.03.21 16:14, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
For some time now I do see the following, when I compile x86-softmmu on s390:
FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/hw_intc_i8259.c.o
cc -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I. -I.. -Iqapi
On 08.03.21 14:50, Alex Bennée wrote:
Hypervisors, especially type-1 ones, need the firmware/bootcode to put
their initial guest somewhere in memory and pass the information to it
via platform data. The guest-loader is modelled after the generic
loader for exactly this sort of purpose:
On 15.03.21 16:58, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15/03/2021 16.50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/15/21 4:42 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15/03/2021 16.14, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
For some time now I do see the following, when I compile x86-softmmu
on s390:
FAILED: libcommon.fa.p
On 15.03.21 16:14, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
For some time now I do see the following, when I compile x86-softmmu on s390:
FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/hw_intc_i8259.c.o
cc -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I. -I.. -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader -I/usr/include/capstone -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib
On 15.03.21 16:42, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15/03/2021 16.14, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
For some time now I do see the following, when I compile x86-softmmu on s390:
FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/hw_intc_i8259.c.o
cc -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I. -I.. -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader -I/usr/include/capstone
For some time now I do see the following, when I compile x86-softmmu on s390:
FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/hw_intc_i8259.c.o
cc -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I. -I.. -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader
-I/usr/include/capstone -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/libmount
On 13.03.21 17:36, Mahmoud Mandour wrote:
Changed a call to malloc() and its respective calls free() with
GLib's allocation and deallocation functions.
Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Mandour
Nack.
This is BIOS code and it does not have glib.
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c | 6 +++---
1 file
On 11.03.21 14:27, Cornelia Huck wrote:
The single-frame z15 is called "z15 T02".
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/ta
always be around on
kernels that also have KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL (>= v3.15).
[1] https://www.ibm.com/support/lifecycle/search?q=z%2FVM
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Richard Henderson
Cc: Halil Pasic
Cc: Cornelia Huck
Cc: Christian Borntraeger
C
also add an assert() to make
> sure that the provided names always fit the size field (which is fine for
> the current callers, the function is called once with "CORE" and once with
> "LINUX" as a name).
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Reviewed-by: Christian Born
On 05.02.21 08:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 05.02.21 07:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 04/02/2021 18.00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> On 04.02.21 17:41, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> According to the "ELF-64 Object File Format" specifi
On 05.02.21 07:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/02/2021 18.00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 04.02.21 17:41, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> According to the "ELF-64 Object File Format" specification:
>>>
>>> "The first word in the entry, names
On 04.02.21 17:41, Thomas Huth wrote:
> According to the "ELF-64 Object File Format" specification:
>
> "The first word in the entry, namesz, identifies the length, in
> bytes, of a name identifying the entry’s owner or originator. The name field
> contains a null-terminated string, with
On 04.02.21 14:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/02/2021 14.01, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03.02.21 10:44, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> According to the "ELF-64 Object File Format" specification:
>>>
>>> "The first word in the
On 03.02.21 10:44, Thomas Huth wrote:
> According to the "ELF-64 Object File Format" specification:
>
> "The first word in the entry, namesz, identifies the length, in
> bytes, of a name identifying the entry’s owner or originator. The name field
> contains a null-terminated string, with
right model. This may be
>a little surprising, but shouldn't actually be harmful.
>
> To start a guest supporting Protected Virtualization using the new
> option use the command line arguments:
> -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pv0
>
-migratable, we would get a failure only when the
guest actually tries to transition; instead, explicitly disallow the
unpack facility if --only-migratable was specified to avoid late
surprises.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand
---
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 10
On 25.01.21 14:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:22:38 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> secure execution (aka protected virtualization) guests cannot be
>> migrated at the moment. Disallow the unpack facility if the user
>> specifies --only-
secure execution (aka protected virtualization) guests cannot be
migrated at the moment. Disallow the unpack facility if the user
specifies --only-migratable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
v1->v2:
- add missing return
- protect check with CONFIG_USER_ONLY for building non soft
On 25.01.21 13:57, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 25.01.21 13:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> secure execution (aka protected virtualization) guests cannot be
>> migrated at the moment. Disallow the unpack facility if the user
>> specifies --only-migratable.
>>
secure execution (aka protected virtualization) guests cannot be
migrated at the moment. Disallow the unpack facility if the user
specifies --only-migratable.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target
On 18.01.21 18:39, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * David Gibson (da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:25:17AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:42:26PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Cornelia Huck (coh...@redhat.com)
On 15.01.21 17:36, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:58:11 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
>> At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV),
>> a mechanism to protect guests from eavesdropping by a compromised
>> hypervisor.
>>
>> This is similar in function
On 14.01.21 15:15, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:09:01PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14.01.21 15:04, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:20:48 +
>>> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>
>>
On 14.01.21 15:04, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:20:48 +
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:50:12PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14.01.21 12:45, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
On 14.01.21 12:45, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Cornelia Huck (coh...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:52:11 +0100
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> On 14.01.21 11:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>>> * Christian
On 14.01.21 11:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Christian Borntraeger (borntrae...@de.ibm.com) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13.01.21 13:42, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * Cornelia Huck (coh...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:41:25 -0800
&
On 13.01.21 13:42, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Cornelia Huck (coh...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:41:25 -0800
>> Ram Pai wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:56:14AM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 10:40:26 -0800
Ram Pai wrote:
>>
> The main
On 14.01.21 10:19, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 14.01.21 10:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14.01.21 00:58, David Gibson wrote:
>> [...]
>>> +int s390_pv_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)
>>&
On 14.01.21 10:10, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 14.01.21 00:58, David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
>> +int s390_pv_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_S390_PV_
On 14.01.21 00:58, David Gibson wrote:
[...]
> +int s390_pv_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp)
> +{
> +if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(cgs), TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST)) {
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
> +if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_UNPACK)) {
> +error_setg(errp,
> +
On 13.01.21 01:57, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:36:07PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> 65;6201;1c> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:15:26 +0100
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> On 12.01.21 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
>>>> At lea
On 12.01.21 12:36, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:15:26 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> On 12.01.21 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
>>> At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV),
>>> a mec
On 12.01.21 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
> At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV),
> a mechanism to protect guests from eavesdropping by a compromised
> hypervisor.
>
> This is similar in function to other mechanisms like AMD's SEV and
> POWER's PEF, which are
On 12.01.21 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pef.h b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..7c92391177
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pef.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/*
> + * PEF (Protected Execution Facility) for POWER support
> + *
>
On 11.01.21 14:17, Miroslav Rezanina wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christian Borntraeger"
>> To: "Thomas Huth" , "Miroslav Rezanina"
>>
>> Cc: "qemu-s390x" , "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
On 11.01.21 13:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 11/01/2021 13.42, Miroslav Rezanina wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Thomas Huth"
>>> To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" , mreza...@redhat.com,
>>> qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "qemu-s390x"
>>>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 1:24:57
On 11.01.21 14:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 11.01.21 13:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 11/01/2021 13.42, Miroslav Rezanina wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Thomas Huth"
>>>> To:
On 11.01.21 11:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/11/21 10:46, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04.01.21 14:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> virtio-fs qualifies as a bootable device minimally under OVMF, but
>>> currently the necessary "bootindex&
file:
>
> /pci@i0cf8/pci-bridge@1,6/pci1af4,105a@0/filesystem@0
>
> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger
> Cc: Cornelia Huck
> Cc: Halil Pasic
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
> Cc: qemu-s3...@nongnu.org
&g
quot;s390: implement pci instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-ins
On 11.12.20 11:51, Janosch Frank wrote:
> There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not
> advertise it and its support facilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
shall we add
Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390
101 - 200 of 2513 matches
Mail list logo
