El 10/6/2015 7:45, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org escribió:
On 10 June 2015 at 10:58, Liviu Ionescu i...@livius.net wrote:
On 29 May 2015, at 22:16, Martin Galvan
martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
... I think Peter M is the maintainer for Target-ARM.
Peter, is
by qemu rather than gdb.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gutson dgut...@codesourcery.com
---
gdbstub.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
index 91c5f68..92bb36d 100644
--- a/gdbstub.c
+++ b/gdbstub.c
@@ -1848,6 +1848,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet
in the 'detach'
packet handling, so subsequent syscalls are solved by qemu rather than gdb.
I tested this manually.
Please commit it for me if accepted, since I don't have write privileges.
Thanks!
Daniel.
2010-02-22 Daniel Gutson dgut...@codesourcery.com
* gdbstub.c
gdb_syscall_mode appropriately in the 'detach'
packet handling, so subsequent syscalls are solved by qemu rather than gdb.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gutson dgut...@codesourcery.com
---
gdbstub.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
index 91c5f68..92bb36d
Hi,
friendly reminder about this patch.
Thanks,
Daniel.
Daniel Gutson wrote:
Any update on this?
Thanks,
Daniel.
Daniel Gutson wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes a bug that caused some NEON shift
operations to shift a wrong amount of bytes.
The problem
