Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] i386: Hyper-V SynIC requires POST_MESSAGES/SIGNAL_EVENTS priviliges

2021-06-07 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:35:27AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:48:34PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> When Hyper-V SynIC is enabled, we may need to allow Windows guests to make > >> hypercall

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] tests/acceptance: add OVMF firmware test to cover x86_64 "host" cpu bug

2021-06-04 Thread Eduardo Habkost
el_cpu_instance_init as post_init"), > commit ("i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn"), > > Cc: Eduardo Habkost > Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov > Cc: Paolo Bonzini > Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana I think basic OVMF boot regression testing is still welcome, but woul

Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] i386: hardcode supported eVMCS version to '1'

2021-06-04 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:28:15AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:48:29PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Currently, the only eVMCS version, supported by KVM (and described in TLFS) > >> is '1'.

Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] qtest/hyperv: Introduce a simple hyper-v test

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
> - 'numa-test'] > + 'numa-test', > + 'hyperv-test'] > > dbus_daemon = find_program('dbus-daemon', required: false) > if dbus_daemon.found() and config_host.has_key('GDBUS_CODEGEN') > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] i386: Hyper-V SynIC requires POST_MESSAGES/SIGNAL_EVENTS priviliges

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
_only check needed? Is the hyperv_synic_kvm_only check the only reason this was done here and not at kvm_hyperv_properties? > +} > + > /* Not exposed by KVM but needed to make CPU hotplug in Windows work */ > c->edx |= HV_CPU_DYNAMIC_PARTITIONING_AVAILABLE; > > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 7/9] i386: HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE privilege bit is always needed

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
f-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] i386: expand Hyper-V features during CPU feature expansion time

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
r_report_err(local_err); > return -ENOSYS; > } > diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm_i386.h b/target/i386/kvm/kvm_i386.h > index dc725083891c..54667b35f09c 100644 > --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm_i386.h > +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm_i386.h > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ bool kvm_has_x2apic_api(void); > bool kvm_has_waitpkg(void); > > bool kvm_hv_vpindex_settable(void); > +bool kvm_hyperv_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp); > > uint64_t kvm_swizzle_msi_ext_dest_id(uint64_t address); Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] i386: make hyperv_expand_features() return bool

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:48:30PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Return 'false' when hyperv_expand_features() sets an error. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] i386: hardcode supported eVMCS version to '1'

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
version; > +error_report("Hyper-V %s verson 1 is not supported by kernel", > + kvm_hyperv_properties[HYPERV_FEAT_EVMCS].desc); > return ret; > } > - > -cpu->hyperv_nested[0] = evmcs_version; > +cpu->hyperv_nested[0] = (1 << 8) | 1; > } > > return 0; > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 2/9] i386: clarify 'hv-passthrough' behavior

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:48:28PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Clarify the fact that 'hv-passthrough' only enables features which are > already known to QEMU and that it overrides all other 'hv-*' settings. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] i386: avoid hardcoding '12' as 'hyperv_vendor_id' length

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > While this is very unlikely to change, let's avoid hardcoding '12' as > 'hyperv_vendor_id' length. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] doc: Fix some mistakes in the SEV documentation

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
al)? I'm queueing this series by now, but we truly need somebody to volunteer as maintainer of the SEV code. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH] Update Linux headers to 5.13-rc4

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 04:17:41PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost > --- > KVM_RUN_X86_BUS_LOCK is a requirement for: > [PATCH v4] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest > Message-Id: <20210521043820.29678-1-chenyi.qi...@intel.com

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn in x86_cpu_realizefn

2021-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote: > On 6/1/21 8:48 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > +Vitaly > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote: > >> we need to expand features first, before we attempt to check them &g

Re: [PATCH v8] qapi: introduce 'query-kvm-cpuid' action

2021-06-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
Is there a default value of ecx for when it is not provided by the > user but needed by the leaf? Or is it an error if ecx is omitted in > that case? Similarly, is it an error if ecx is provided but not > needed? What does "not provided by the user" mean here? This is not describing the input to a QMP command, but the input to the CPUID instruction. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH] target/i386/sev: Ensure sev_fw_errlist is sync with update-linux-headers

2021-06-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
s patches always consist of 100% automated changes. This patch would require a manual update of target/i386/sev.c to be included in the same commit as the header update. > > > > #define SEV_FW_MAX_ERROR ARRAY_SIZE(sev_fw_errlist) > > > > @@ -160,6 +162,7 @@ fw_error_to_str(int code) > > if (code < 0 || code >= SEV_FW_MAX_ERROR) { > > return "unknown error"; > > } > > +assert(sev_fw_errlist[code]); > > > > return sev_fw_errlist[code]; > > } > > > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v8] qapi: introduce 'query-kvm-cpuid' action

2021-06-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
implementation is trivial, and a raw copy of the KVM CPUID table makes it a more useful (KVM-specific) debugging/testing mechanism. I don't really mind how the command is called, but I would prefer to add a more complex abstraction only if maintainers of other accelerators are interested and volunteer to provide similar functionality. I don't want to introduce complexity for use cases that may not even exist. > > > +# > > +# Returns: a list of CpuidEntry > > +# > > +# Since: 6.1 > > +## > > +{ 'command': 'query-kvm-cpuid', > > + 'returns': ['CpuidEntry'], > > + 'if': 'defined(TARGET_I386) && defined(CONFIG_KVM)' } > ... > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c b/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > > index c98b78d033..48add3ada1 100644 > > --- a/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > > +++ b/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int query_error_class(const char *cmd) > > { "query-balloon", ERROR_CLASS_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE }, > > { "query-hotpluggable-cpus", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > > { "query-vm-generation-id", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > > +{ "query-kvm-cpuid", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > > { NULL, -1 } > > }; > > int i; > > > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v4] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 02:18:37PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 01:14:54PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote: > > > > > > On 5/28/2021 5:19 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:38:20PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] i386: run accel_cpu_instance_init as instance_post_init

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
u_type_info = { > .parent = TYPE_CPU, > .instance_size = sizeof(X86CPU), > .instance_init = x86_cpu_initfn, > +.instance_post_init = x86_cpu_post_initfn, > + > .abstract = true, > .class_size = sizeof(X86CPUClass), > .class_init = x86_cpu_common_class_init, > -- > 2.26.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn in x86_cpu_realizefn

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
= CPUID_MWAIT_EMX | CPUID_MWAIT_IBE; > + The dependency between those lines and cpu_exec_realizefn() is completely unclear here. What can we do to make this clearer and less fragile? Note that this is not a comment on this fix, specifically, but on how the initialization ordering is easy to break here. > /* For 64bit systems think about the number of physical bits to present. > * ideally this should be the same as the host; anything other than > matching > * the host can cause incorrect guest behaviour. > -- > 2.26.2 > -- Eduardo

[PULL 24/24] sev: add missing firmware error conditions

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
: <20210430134830.254741-3-cku...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/sev.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c index 5467407ee1d..83df8c09f6a 100644 --- a/target/i386/sev.c +++ b/target/i386/sev.c @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ static

[PULL 21/24] i386: use global kvm_state in hyperv_enabled() check

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov There is no need to use vCPU-specific kvm state in hyperv_enabled() check and we need to do that when feature expansion happens early, before vCPU specific KVM state is created. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id

[PULL 16/24] i386: split hyperv_handle_properties() into hyperv_expand_features()/hyperv_fill_cpuids()

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov The intention is to call hyperv_expand_features() early, before vCPUs are created and use the acquired data later when we set guest visible CPUID data. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-10-vkuzn...@redhat.

[PULL 19/24] i386: adjust the expected KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID array size

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov SYNDBG leaves were recently (Linux-5.8) added to KVM but we haven't updated the expected size of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID output in KVM so we now make serveral tries before succeeding. Update the default. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost

[PULL 18/24] i386: switch hyperv_expand_features() to using error_setg()

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Use standard error_setg() mechanism in hyperv_expand_features(). Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-12-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/kvm/kvm.c

[PULL 14/24] i386: drop FEAT_HYPERV feature leaves

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
converted to using raw CPUID func/reg pairs for features, this allows us to get rid of hv_cpuid_get_fw() conversion. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-8-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu

[PULL 15/24] i386: introduce hv_cpuid_cache

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
sor to it. Note, hv_cpuid_get_fw() is converted to using hv_cpuid_get_host() just to be removed later with Hyper-V specific feature words. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-9-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --

Re: [PATCH v4] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 01:14:54PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote: > > > On 5/28/2021 5:19 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:38:20PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote: > > [...] > > > @@ -4222,6 +4247,15 @@ void kvm_arch_pre_run(CPUState *c

[PULL 13/24] i386: introduce hv_cpuid_get_host()

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov As a preparation to implementing hv_cpuid_cache intro introduce hv_cpuid_get_host(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-7-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo H

[PULL 17/24] i386: move eVMCS enablement to hyperv_init_vcpu()

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov hyperv_expand_features() will be called before we create vCPU so evmcs enablement should go away. hyperv_init_vcpu() looks like the right place. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-11-vkuzn...@redhat.

[PULL 22/24] target/i386/sev: add support to query the attestation report

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
ngh Reviewed-by: Connor Kuehl Message-Id: <20210429170728.24322-1-brijesh.si...@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 8 + target/i386/sev_i386.h| 2 ++ qapi/misc-target.json | 38 ++ target/i386/monitor.c | 6 target/i386

[PULL 09/24] i386: invert hyperv_spinlock_attempts setting logic with hv_passthrough

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov There is no need to have this special case: like all other Hyper-V enlightenments we can just use kernel's supplied value in hv_passthrough mode. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-3-vkuzn...@redhat.

[PULL 12/24] i386: introduce hyperv_feature_supported()

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Clean up hv_cpuid_check_and_set() by separating hyperv_feature_supported() off it. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-6-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo H

[PULL 20/24] i386: prefer system KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID ioctl over vCPU's one

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID was made a system wide ioctl which can be called prior to creating vCPUs and we are going to use that to expand Hyper-V cpu features early. Use it when it is supported by KVM. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost

[PULL 07/24] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'max' CPU

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
and stepping taken from a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+ which is one of the first 64-bit AMD CPUs. Closes https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/191 Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Message-Id: <20210507133650.645526-3-berra...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo H

[PULL 10/24] i386: always fill Hyper-V CPUID feature leaves from X86CPU data

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
about to the guest but arguably this is a good change. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-4-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 9 - 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[PULL 08/24] i386: keep hyperv_vendor string up-to-date

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
.g. QMP's query-cpu-model-expansion output is incorrect. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-2-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu.c | 19 +-- target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 5 +

[PULL 06/24] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'qemu64' CPU

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
and stepping taken from a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+ which is one of the first 64-bit AMD CPUs. Closes https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/191 Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210507133650.645526-2-berra...@redhat.com> Sign

[PULL 04/24] target/i386/cpu: Constify X86CPUDefinition

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-Id: <20210503173524.833052-3-phi...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu.c | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/targe

[PULL 23/24] sev: use explicit indices for mapping firmware error codes to strings

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
wed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-Id: <20210430134830.254741-2-cku...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/sev.c | 46 +++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/se

[PULL 02/24] i386: Document when features can be added to kvm_default_props

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
It's very easy to mistakenly extend kvm_default_props to include features that require a kernel version that's too recent. Add a comment warning about that, pointing to the documentation file where the minimum kernel version for KVM is documented. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost Acked-by: Paolo

[PULL 05/24] i386/cpu_dump: support AVX512 ZMM regs dump

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
registers no matter YMM/ZMM is enabled. This patch is to complement this, let it dump XMM/YMM/ZMM accordingly. Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Message-Id: <1618986232-73826-1-git-send-email-robert...@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu-

[PULL 11/24] i386: stop using env->features[] for filling Hyper-V CPUIDs

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
wed-by: Eduardo Habkost Message-Id: <20210422161130.652779-5-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu.h | 1 + target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 80 +++ 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i38

[PULL 03/24] target/i386/cpu: Constify CPUCaches

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-Id: <20210503173524.833052-2-phi...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/i386/cpu.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386

[PULL 00/24] x86 queue, 2021-06-01

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
CPUCaches and X86CPUDefinition (Philippe Mathieu-Daudé) * Document when features can be added to kvm_default_props (Eduardo Habkost) Brijesh Singh (1): target/i386/sev: add support to query the attestation report Connor Kuehl (2): sev

[PULL 01/24] target/i386: Add CPU model versions supporting 'xsaves'

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
odels have 'xsaves' enabled from the very beginning so the comment blaming KVM to explain why other CPUs lack 'xsaves' is likely outdated. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Message-Id: <20210412073952.860944-1-vkuzn...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- target/

Re: [PATCH v3] target/i386/sev: add support to query the attestation report

2021-06-01 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:01:16PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:07:28PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > The SEV FW >= 0.23 added a new command that can be used to query the > > attestation report containing the SHA-256 digest of the guest memory >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RESEND] SEV firmware error list touchups

2021-05-31 Thread Eduardo Habkost
t; 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) I'm queueing this on x86-next, apologies for the delay. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v3] target/i386/sev: add support to query the attestation report

2021-05-31 Thread Eduardo Habkost
r_setg(errp, "SEV: mnonce must be %ld bytes (got %ld)", > +sizeof(input.mnonce), len); This breaks the build on i386. Failed CI job: https://gitlab.com/ehabkost/qemu/-/jobs/1300032082 I'm applying the following fixup. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- diff --git

Re: [PATCH v4] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
T_X86_BUS_LOCK: > +/* already handled in kvm_arch_post_run */ > +ret = 0; > +break; > default: > fprintf(stderr, "KVM: unknown exit reason %d\n", run->exit_reason); > ret = -1; > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/i386: Trivial code motion

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:53:51AM +0800, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:16 AM Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:00:56PM +0800, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > Move the float translation case to a new block by a new pair of braces. > &

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/i386: Correct implementation for FCS, FIP, FDS and FDP

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
t removing this > feature flag in this patch and leaving a TODO in the comment? Thus I > can issue another patch > to complete the feature later. Sounds better to me. Otherwise you'll be just adding dead code (because the flag will is impossible to be enabled if it's not present in TCG_*_FEATURES). -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 5/5] hw/core/cpu: removed cpu_dump_statistics function

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
rsen (billionai) Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v3] target/i386/sev: add support to query the attestation report

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
Cc: Paolo Bonzini > Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org > Reviewed-by: James Bottomley > Tested-by: James Bottomley > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh Queued, thanks! -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] i386: KVM: expand Hyper-V features early

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:39:02AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Vitaly Kuznetsov (19): > >> i386: keep hyperv_vendor string up-to-date > >> i386:

Re: [PATCH v6 17/19] i386: HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE privilege bit is always needed

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:37:59AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Eduardo Habkost writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:28PM +0200,

Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] i386: move eVMCS enablement to hyperv_init_vcpu()

2021-05-27 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:27:01AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:00:37PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > [...] > >> >> @@ -1455,6 +1454,21 @@ static

Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] qapi: introduce 'query-cpu-model-cpuid' action

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
UState *cs) > if (r) { > goto fail; > } > +if (!cpuid_data_cached) { > +cpuid_data_cached = g_malloc0(sizeof(cpuid_data)); > +memcpy(cpuid_data_cached, _data, sizeof(cpuid_data)); You are going to copy more entries than necessary, but on the other hand I like the simplicity of not having to calculate the struct size before allocating. > +} Now I'm wondering if we want to cache the CPUID tables for all VCPUs (not just the first one). Being a debugging command, maybe it's an acceptable compromise to copy the data only from one VCPU. If the need to return data for other VCPUs arise, we can extend the command later. > > if (has_xsave) { > env->xsave_buf = qemu_memalign(4096, sizeof(struct kvm_xsave)); > diff --git a/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c b/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > index c98b78d033..f5a926b61b 100644 > --- a/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > +++ b/tests/qtest/qmp-cmd-test.c > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int query_error_class(const char *cmd) > { "query-balloon", ERROR_CLASS_DEVICE_NOT_ACTIVE }, > { "query-hotpluggable-cpus", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > { "query-vm-generation-id", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > +{ "query-cpu-model-cpuid", ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR }, > { NULL, -1 } > }; > int i; > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] i386: KVM: expand Hyper-V features early

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE privilege bit is always needed > i386: Hyper-V SynIC requires POST_MESSAGES/SIGNAL_EVENTS priviliges > qtest/hyperv: Introduce a simple hyper-v test -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 0/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for generic CPUs

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 02:36:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] > Daniel P. Berrangé (2): > i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'qemu64' CPU > i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'max' CPU Queued, thanks! -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 2/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'max' CPU

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
issues/191 > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'qemu64' CPU

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
t; +{ "qemu64" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "model", "6" }, > +{ "qemu64" "-" TYPE_X86_CPU, "stepping", "3" }, I wish we could have done this using a new CPU model version, but the new version wouldn't be very useful

Re: [PATCH v6 17/19] i386: HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE privilege bit is always needed

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> According to TLFS, Hyper-V guest is supposed to check > >> HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE

Re: [PATCH v6 15/19] i386: expand Hyper-V features during CPU feature expansion time

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
l will hide bugs in query-cpu-model-expansion. > > > > The first expansion will do nothing if KVM_CAP_SYS_HYPERV_CPUID is not > supported, calling it here allows us to proceed. The series makes > 'query-cpu-model-expansion' output correct only with > KVM_CAP_SYS_HYPERV_CPUID, without it we don't seem to be able to do much > (unless we decide to create a 'scratch' CPU or something like that). Oh, I see. I suggest adding a comment explaining that. Developers might be tempted to delete it and not notice it breaks under older kernels. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 13/19] i386: prefer system KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID ioctl over vCPU's one

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
ection in the docs, or it should be moved to the supported build platforms section. We have a clear policy on supported build platforms [https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/system/build-platforms.html], but not a clear policy for KVM kernel dependencies. There's a table with Python and GCC versions at [https://wiki.qemu.org/Supported_Build_Platforms]. Maybe it could include kernel version information as well. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] i386: move eVMCS enablement to hyperv_init_vcpu()

2021-05-26 Thread Eduardo Habkost
PERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS, and bail out if this fails. Propagate > the the acquired evmcs version to 'cpu->hyperv_nested[]' otherwise. This will be visible to the guest at CPUID[0x400A].EAX, correct? You are initializing CPUID data with a value that change depending on the host. What is supposed to happen if live migrating to to a host with a different evmcs_version? -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 17/19] i386: HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE privilege bit is always needed

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
{.func = HV_CPUID_FEATURES, .reg = R_EDX, > .bits = HV_FREQUENCY_MSRS_AVAILABLE} > } > @@ -888,7 +890,8 @@ static struct { > .desc = "reenlightenment MSRs (hv-reenlightenment)", > .flags = { > {.func = HV_CPUID_FEATURES, .reg = R_EAX, > - .bits = HV_ACCESS_REENLIGHTENMENTS_CONTROL} > + .bits = HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE | > + HV_ACCESS_REENLIGHTENMENTS_CONTROL} > } > }, > [HYPERV_FEAT_TLBFLUSH] = { > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 16/19] i386: kill off hv_cpuid_check_and_set()

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
led in 'cpu->hyperv_features' as > + * hv_build_cpuid_leaf() uses this info to build guest CPUIDs. > + */ > +for (feat = 0; feat < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_hyperv_properties); feat++) { > +if (hyperv_feature_supported(cs, feat)) { > +

Re: [PATCH v6 15/19] i386: expand Hyper-V features during CPU feature expansion time

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
b/target/i386/kvm/kvm_i386.h > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ bool kvm_has_x2apic_api(void); > bool kvm_has_waitpkg(void); > > bool kvm_hv_vpindex_settable(void); > +void kvm_hyperv_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp); > > uint64_t kvm_swizzle_msi_ext_dest_id(uint64_t address); > > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 14/19] i386: use global kvm_state in hyperv_enabled() check

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
tsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 13/19] i386: prefer system KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID ioctl over vCPU's one

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS) > 0) { Oh, this conditional replaces the comment I suggested in patch 10/19. It makes it obvious that the hack can be deleted if we remove support for the VCPU ioctl. So, when exactly will we be able to delete the VCPU ioctl code and support only the system ioctl? Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > for (i = 0; i < cpuid->nent; i++) { > if (cpuid->entries[i].function == HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO) { > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 12/19] i386: adjust the expected KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID array size

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
; > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 11/19] i386: switch hyperv_expand_features() to using error_setg()

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
kvm_hyperv_properties[HYPERV_FEAT_SYNIC].desc, > + kvm_hyperv_properties[HYPERV_FEAT_VPINDEX].desc); > } > - > -return 0; > } > > /* > @@ -1527,9 +1547,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs) > env->apic_bus_freq = KVM_APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY; > > /* Paravirtualization CPUIDs */ > -r = hyperv_expand_features(cs); > -if (r < 0) { > -return r; > +hyperv_expand_features(cs, _err); > +if (local_err) { > +error_report_err(local_err); > +return -ENOSYS; > } > > if (hyperv_enabled(cpu)) { I don't want to block this series because of the suggestions above, so: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost But I still encourage you to implement those suggestions, anyway. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] i386: move eVMCS enablement to hyperv_init_vcpu()

2021-05-21 Thread Eduardo Habkost
base = KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE_NEXT; > has_msr_hv_hypercall = true; > @@ -1868,11 +1887,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs) > > kvm_init_msrs(cpu); > > -r = hyperv_init_vcpu(cpu); > -if (r) { > -goto fail; > -} > - > return 0; I would move the two hunks above to a separate patch, but not a big deal. The guest ABI issue is existing, and the comment suggestion can be done in a follow up patch, so: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > > fail: > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 09/19] i386: split hyperv_handle_properties() into hyperv_expand_features()/hyperv_fill_cpuids()

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:20PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > The intention is to call hyperv_expand_features() early, before vCPUs > are created and use the acquired data later when we set guest visible > CPUID data. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH v6 08/19] i386: introduce hv_cpuid_cache

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
duce persistent hv_cpuid_cache and hv_cpuid_get_host() > accessor to it. > > Note, hv_cpuid_get_fw() is converted to using hv_cpuid_get_host() > just to be removed later with Hyper-V specific feature words. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 07/19] i386: drop FEAT_HYPERV feature leaves

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
t; Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- > target/i386/cpu.c | 90 +-- > target/i386/cpu.h | 5 -- > target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 108 ++ > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) Nice diffstat! Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 06/19] i386: introduce hv_cpuid_get_host()

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
> +entry = cpuid_find_entry(cpuid, func, 0); > +if (!entry) { > +return 0; One possible difference here is that leaves not supported by the host will now be zeroed out. ...which I expected to be the correct behavior of hv-passthrough, so: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > +

Re: [PATCH v6 05/19] i386: introduce hyperv_feature_supported()

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
upported(cpuid, feature)) { > +if (hyperv_feat_enabled(cpu, feature)) { > +fprintf(stderr, > +"Hyper-V %s is not supported by kernel\n", > +kvm_hyperv_properties[feature].desc); > + return 1; > +} else { > +return 0; The reason for returning prematurely here when !hyperv_feat_enabled() is not clear to me, but you are keeping the existing behavior, so: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > } > } > > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 04/19] i386: stop using env->features[] for filling Hyper-V CPUIDs

2021-05-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 08:34:40PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:15PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > As a preparatory patch to dropping Hyper-V CPUID leaves from > > feature_word_info[] stop using env->features[] as a temporary > > s

Re: [PATCH v3] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest

2021-05-19 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:00:18PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote: > > > On 5/18/2021 3:46 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > +Stefan > > > > I have a question about ratelimit_set_speed() below: > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:33:05PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrot

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/i386: Correct implementation for FCS, FIP, FDS and FDP

2021-05-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
goto unknown_op; > } > } > + > +if (update_fip) { > +tcg_gen_ld32u_tl(s->T0, cpu_env, > +offsetof(CPUX86State, segs[R_CS].selector)); > +tcg_gen_st16_tl(s->T0, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUX86State, fpcs)); > + > +tcg_gen_movi_tl(s->T0, pc_start - s->cs_base); > +tcg_gen_st_tl(s->T0, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUX86State, fpip)); > +} > + > +if (update_fdp) { > +if (s->override >= 0) { > +last_seg = s->override; > +} > +tcg_gen_ld32u_tl(s->T0, cpu_env, > + offsetof(CPUX86State, > + segs[last_seg].selector)); > +tcg_gen_st16_tl(s->T0, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUX86State, fpds)); > + > +tcg_gen_st_tl(last_addr, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUX86State, > fpdp)); > +} > } > break; > // > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] target/i386: Trivial code motion

2021-05-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
v_FT0_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_helper_fucom_ST0_FT0(cpu_env); > +break; > +case 0x2d: /* fucomp st(i) */ > +gen_helper_fmov_FT0_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_helper_fucom_ST0_FT0(cpu_env); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +break; > +case 0x33: /* de/3 */ > +switch (rm) { > +case 1: /* fcompp */ > +gen_helper_fmov_FT0_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(1)); > +gen_helper_fcom_ST0_FT0(cpu_env); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +break; > +default: > +goto unknown_op; > +} > +break; > +case 0x38: /* ffreep sti, undocumented op */ > +gen_helper_ffree_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +break; > +case 0x3c: /* df/4 */ > +switch (rm) { > +case 0: > +gen_helper_fnstsw(s->tmp2_i32, cpu_env); > +tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(s->T0, s->tmp2_i32); > +gen_op_mov_reg_v(s, MO_16, R_EAX, s->T0); > +break; > +default: > +goto unknown_op; > +} > +break; > +case 0x3d: /* fucomip */ > +if (!(s->cpuid_features & CPUID_CMOV)) { > +goto illegal_op; > +} > +gen_update_cc_op(s); > +gen_helper_fmov_FT0_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_helper_fucomi_ST0_FT0(cpu_env); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +set_cc_op(s, CC_OP_EFLAGS); > +break; > +case 0x3e: /* fcomip */ > +if (!(s->cpuid_features & CPUID_CMOV)) { > +goto illegal_op; > +} > +gen_update_cc_op(s); > +gen_helper_fmov_FT0_STN(cpu_env, tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_helper_fcomi_ST0_FT0(cpu_env); > +gen_helper_fpop(cpu_env); > +set_cc_op(s, CC_OP_EFLAGS); > +break; > +case 0x10 ... 0x13: /* fcmovxx */ > +case 0x18 ... 0x1b: > +{ > +int op1; > +TCGLabel *l1; > +static const uint8_t fcmov_cc[8] = { > +(JCC_B << 1), > +(JCC_Z << 1), > +(JCC_BE << 1), > +(JCC_P << 1), > +}; > + > +if (!(s->cpuid_features & CPUID_CMOV)) { > +goto illegal_op; > +} > +op1 = fcmov_cc[op & 3] | (((op >> 3) & 1) ^ 1); > +l1 = gen_new_label(); > +gen_jcc1_noeob(s, op1, l1); > +gen_helper_fmov_ST0_STN(cpu_env, > tcg_const_i32(opreg)); > +gen_set_label(l1); > +} > +break; > +default: > +goto unknown_op; > } > -break; > -default: > -goto unknown_op; > } > } > break; > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] hw: Various Kconfig fixes

2021-05-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:18:56PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > CCing Build system architecture maintainer (Daniel). Oops, I was misled by the subsection title. Daniel is responsible only for the build system documentation. Do we have any volunteers willing to be listed as review

Re: [PATCH v3] i386: Add ratelimit for bus locks acquired in guest

2021-05-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
et-extensions-programming-reference.html > > Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang > > --- > Changes from v2: > - do some rename work (bus-lock-ratelimit and BUS_LOCK_TIME_SLICE). > (Eduardo) > - change to register a class property at the x86_machine_class_init() >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] hw: Various Kconfig fixes

2021-05-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
nfig | 5 + > hw/riscv/meson.build | 2 +- > 12 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.26.3 > > > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] target/i386: Enable XSS feature enumeration for CPUID

2021-05-06 Thread Eduardo Habkost
XSTATE_BNDCSR_MASK | XSTATE_OPMASK_MASK | \ > + XSTATE_ZMM_Hi256_MASK | \ > + XSTATE_Hi16_ZMM_MASK | XSTATE_PKRU_MASK) > + > +/* CPUID feature bits available in XSS */ > +#define CPUID_XSTATE_XSS_MASK0 Do you expect this to be used outside target/i386/cpu.c? If not, maybe it could be moved close to the x86_ext_save_areas[] definition, as any updates to x86_ext_save_areas will require an update to these macros. > + > /* CPUID feature words */ > typedef enum FeatureWord { > FEAT_1_EDX, /* CPUID[1].EDX */ > @@ -541,6 +551,8 @@ typedef enum FeatureWord { > FEAT_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAPS, > FEAT_VMX_BASIC, > FEAT_VMX_VMFUNC, > +FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO, /* CPUID[EAX=0xd,ECX=1].ECX */ > +FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI, /* CPUID[EAX=0xd,ECX=1].EDX */ > FEATURE_WORDS, > } FeatureWord; > > -- > 2.26.2 > > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] numa/exec/migration: Fix resizing RAM blocks while migrating

2021-05-06 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:26:58PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > v4 has been floating around for a while. Let's see if we can find someone > to merge this; or at least give some more feedback ... all patches have > at least one RB. Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost David Gilbert:

Re: [PATCH v6] i386/cpu_dump: support AVX512 ZMM regs dump

2021-05-06 Thread Eduardo Habkost
for > years. > But in x86_cpu_dump_state(), still only dump XMM registers no matter > YMM/ZMM is enabled. > This patch is to complement this, let it dump XMM/YMM/ZMM accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Queued, thanks! -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/i386/cpu: Constify CPUCaches and X86CPUDefinition

2021-05-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
on Queued, thanks! -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v7 02/12] accel: Introduce 'query-accels' QMP command

2021-05-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
d what "target-specific poisoning of accelerator definitions" means. > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > Tested-by: Alex Bennée > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Sorry for not even reviewing this before, but still: Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v26 00/20] i386 cleanup PART 2

2021-05-05 Thread Eduardo Habkost
ml > > Then these aren't required: > - tests: restrict TCG-only arm-cpu-features tests to TCG builds > - tests: device-introspect-test: cope with ARM TCG-only devices > > These could be reworked to use qtest_has_accel() instead of the > /* XXX */ comments: > - tests: do not r

Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: drop deprecated scsi=on|off property

2021-05-04 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:32:55PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:03:52PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 04:52:21PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > Live migrating old guests from an old QEMU with the SCSI feature

Re: [PATCH v6 04/19] i386: stop using env->features[] for filling Hyper-V CPUIDs

2021-04-30 Thread Eduardo Habkost
d_leaf(cs, FEAT_HV_RECOMM_EAX); [Line3] > c->ebx = cpu->hyperv_spinlock_attempts; > > +if (cpu->hyperv_no_nonarch_cs == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) { > +c->eax |= HV_NO_NONARCH_CORESHARING; > +} else if (cpu->hyperv_no_nonarch_cs == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) { > +c2 = cpuid_find_entry(cpuid, HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO, 0); > +if (c2) { > +c->eax |= c2->eax & HV_NO_NONARCH_CORESHARING; > +} > +} > + > c = _ent[cpuid_i++]; > c->function = HV_CPUID_IMPLEMENT_LIMITS; > c->eax = cpu->hv_max_vps; > @@ -1358,7 +1362,7 @@ static int hyperv_handle_properties(CPUState *cs, > > c = _ent[cpuid_i++]; > c->function = HV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES; > -c->eax = env->features[FEAT_HV_NESTED_EAX]; > +c->eax = cpu->hyperv_nested[0]; > } > r = cpuid_i; > > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v6 03/19] i386: always fill Hyper-V CPUID feature leaves from X86CPU data

2021-04-30 Thread Eduardo Habkost
y make hv-passthrough supported in production when live migration support isn't required. I'll trust your judgement here and assume this is really a good change, but maybe this should be documented more explicitly in the hv-passthrough section at docs/hyperv.txt? Anyway: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habk

Re: [PATCH v6 02/19] i386: invert hyperv_spinlock_attempts setting logic with hv_passthrough

2021-04-30 Thread Eduardo Habkost
cting all properties set explicitly to override hv-passthrough. Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- > target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/

Re: [PATCH v6 01/19] i386: keep hyperv_vendor string up-to-date

2021-04-30 Thread Eduardo Habkost
cpu->hyperv_vendor_id) + > 1); > +memcpy(cpu->hyperv_vendor, cpu->hyperv_vendor_id, > + sizeof(cpu->hyperv_vendor_id)); > +cpu->hyperv_vendor[sizeof(cpu->hyperv_vendor_id)] = 0; I don't like having to do manual g_realloc() + memcpy() here (calling object_property_set_str() would be simpler), but I believe it will be easier to clean this up after this whole series is applied. Reluctantly: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > } > > c = cpuid_find_entry(cpuid, HV_CPUID_INTERFACE, 0); > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH v2] target/i386: add "-cpu, lbr-fmt=*" support to enable guest LBR

2021-04-30 Thread Eduardo Habkost
r-fmt=0xff" is a "valid" lbr-fmt > and it may enable guest LBR (depend on the "migratable" flag). You are correct, lbr-fmt=0xff will be synonymous to "use default lbr-fmt", but this won't be obvious. You can avoid this by validating the user-provided value in a property setter. Or you could just document that 0xff has a special meaning, to avoid a custom setter. I believe custom setters are more likely to cause us problems in the future than users fiddling with obviously an invalid lbr-fmt value. -- Eduardo

Re: Let's remove some deprecated stuff

2021-04-29 Thread Eduardo Habkost
ime to adapt to this yet. As far as I understand, they need the following series to be merged first so they can more easily resolve the unversioned CPU model name aliases: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20201013230457.150630-1-ehabk...@redhat.com I need to rebase that series and resubmit. -- Eduardo

Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: drop deprecated scsi=on|off property

2021-04-29 Thread Eduardo Habkost
= G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_2_5); > > GlobalProperty hw_compat_2_4[] = { > -/* Optional because the 'scsi' property is Linux-only */ > -{ "virtio-blk-device", "scsi", "true", .optional = true }, > { "e1000", "extra_mac_registers", "off" }, > { "virtio-pci", "x-disable-pcie", "on" }, > { "virtio-pci", "migrate-extra", "off" }, -- Eduardo

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >