Defining _GNU_SOURCE causes musl to define everything including
everything protected by _XOPEN_SOURCE. However it does not cause
musl to define _XOPEN_SOURCE.
On the other hand, the ncurses header specifically checks for
_XOPEN_SOURCE or _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED.
So it is not completely clear
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 16:39, Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > The F_EXLCK and F_SHLCK fcntl lock constants are obsolete synonyms for
> > F_WRLCK and F_RDLCK.
>
> This seems unlikely, since on for instance Alpha F_EXLCK is
> 1
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 16:41, Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > This fixes a compilation error with the musl c library.
> > ---
> > I don't really understand the purpose of the hack, which was
> > introduced in
> >
> &g
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 16:39, Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > The F_EXLCK and F_SHLCK fcntl lock constants are obsolete synonyms for
> > F_WRLCK and F_RDLCK.
>
> This seems unlikely, since on for instance Alpha F_EXLCK is
> 1
This removes the last usage of in the code base.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 3d1f694..4bfb671 100644
--- a/linux-user/sys
This fixes a compilation error with the musl c library.
---
I don't really understand the purpose of the hack, which was
introduced in
http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=624f7979058b84cbf81c76d45f302ce757b213ca
but musl does not have a separate thread library (it is included in
libc.so),
The F_EXLCK and F_SHLCK fcntl lock constants are obsolete synonyms for
F_WRLCK and F_RDLCK. Include to fix compilation with
the musl c library, which does not expose these constants.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 ins
integer type promotions. Since glibc-2.4
is now a decade old, we can remove this workaround.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
---
linux-user/mmap.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 September 2016 at 18:20, Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
> > ---
> > linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
&g
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:14PM -0400, Felix Janda wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
>
> Have you run the mremap tests of ltp with this on your host/guest
> combo?
I have just run the tests. My host
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.ja...@posteo.de>
---
linux-user/mmap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/mmap.c b/linux-user/mmap.c
index c4371d9..4882816 100644
--- a/linux-user/mmap.c
+++ b/linux-user/mmap.c
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ ab
ping (forgot to CC to maintainer before)
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/417154/
The resource argument is translated from host to target for
[gs]etprlimit but not for prlimit64. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
