Hello Stefan,
Can you expand on this some more? I have similar concerns for Livebackup.
At the beginning of your paragraph, did you mean 'asynchronous I/O
emulation' instead of 'synchronous I/O emulation'?
Also, I don't understand the 'stack' construct that you refer to. When you
say 'push
On 6/7/2011 5:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Marcelo Tosattimtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
I haven't reviewed this whole patch yet, but comments below.
This patch, like image streaming, may hit deadlocks due to synchronous
I/O emulation. I discovered this problem
On 5/27/2011 9:46 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczistefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Dor Laordl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/20/2011 03:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I'm interested in what the API for snapshots would look
Hello Stefan,
I have been thinking about this since you sent out this message.
A quick look at the libvirt API indicates that their notion of a
snapshot often refers to a disk+memory snapshot. It would
be good to provide feedback to the libvirt developers to make
sure that proper support for a
in these three
technologies, I think we should support all three in base
qemu. This would make qemu/qemu-kvm more feature rich
than vmware, xen and hyper-v.
Thanks,
Jagane
On 5/17/2011 3:53 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 05/16/2011 11:23 AM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
Hello Dor,
Let me see if I understand live
Hello Dor,
Let me see if I understand live snapshot correctly:
If I want to configure a VM for daily backup, then I would do
the following:
- Create a snapshot s1. s0 is marked read-only.
- Do a full backup of s0 on day 0.
- On day 1, I would create a new snapshot s2, then
copy over the
Hello Dor,
One important advantage of live snapshot over live backup is support of
multiple (consecutive) live snapshots while there can be only a single
live backup at one time.
This is why I tend to think that although live backup carry some benefit
(no merge required), the live snapshot +
On 5/12/2011 8:33 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 05/09/11 15:40, Dor Laor wrote:
Summary:
* We need Marcelo's new (to come) block copy implementation
* should work in parallel to migration and hotplug
* General copy on read is desirable
* Live snapshot merge to be implemented using
